Cited by 275Digital Innovation in IndustriesCorporate Management and LeadershipBusiness Strategies and Innovation

From disruptively digital to proudly analog: a holistic typology of digital transformation strategies

Tekic, Zeljko, Koroteev, Dmitry·2019·Business Horizons

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bushor.2019.07.002

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tekic, Z., & Koroteev, D.
Affiliations
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
Venue
Business Horizons
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
683-693
ISSN
0007-6813 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2975472151
Cited by
275
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
42.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Business Horizons (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Digital Innovation in Industries
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
Keywords
digital transformation, digital transformation strategy, strategy typology, digital technologies, leadership styles, employee creativity, entrepreneurial spirit, transformation risk, transformation failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review