The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of generative AI on higher education learning and teaching: A study of educators’ perspectives
Open accessAbstract
In recent months, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has had, and will continue to have, a dramatic impact on Higher Education (HE). A study conducted by researchers at a leading university in Australia surveyed 30 of their teaching staff, drawn predominantly from their teaching academy, and interviewed eight of them regarding the impact of AI on HE. Data were analyzed using the procedures of Inductive Thematic Analysis and revealed a lack of any homogenous sentiment around AI in HE and much ambiguity regarding best practice regarding recent technological developments. The results indicate concerns exist around concepts relating to academic integrity, however, these concerns may be exaggerated. Almost half of the participants indicated they were using AI within their teaching roles with the most common design change being modifications to assessments. Less than a quarter of staff agreed the university has adequately equipped them for AI, and more than three quarters indicated they would like support. They unanimously assumed the technology will improve. Keeping in mind universities’ obligation to serve students by preparing them for industry, it is vitally important that the HE sector stays informed of developments in AI and commit to ongoing research and discussions regarding best practice in response to AI. However, anything regarding AI and future developments will be extremely difficult to predict.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among university teachers, academic integrity and cheating are major concerns (Bozkurt, 2024;Johnston et al., 2024;Lee et al., 2024;Newell et al., 2024;Overono & Ditta, 2025;Perkins et al., 2024;Xia et al., 2024;Yusuf et al., 2024).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“As in other empirical contexts (e.g., Bozkurt, 2024;Johnston et al., 2024;Lee et al., 2024;Newell et al., 2024;Yusuf et al., 2024), academic integrity was a focus, especially for teachers.”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Research participants' concerns included and extended beyond academic integrity, the topic that dominates much academic research on genAI in higher education (Bozkurt, 2024;Johnston et al., 2024;Lee et al., 2024;Newell et al., 2024;Overono & Ditta, 2025;Perkins et al., 2024;Xia et al., 2024;Yusuf et al., 2024).”
From Toward Partnership Ethics for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Environments with abundant resources more readily establish stable training programs, clear procedural guidelines, and sustainable teaching support, thereby enhancing students’ trust in institutional legitimacy and reducing uncertainty-related anxiety (Lee et al., 2024).”
From Multidimensional responses to generative AI in higher education: an integrative framework linking institutional governance, teaching practice, and student psychological adaptation (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“studies where AI-assisted journaling reduced writing anxiety”
From Enhancing Student Success through AI-Assisted Reflective Learning in Entrepreneurship Education: An Empirical Study (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Additional concerns such as bias in AI outputs (Lee et al., 2024) and lack of transparency in model decisions (Wang et al., 2024) further compound this hesitancy.”
From Educators’ perceptions of generative AI: Investigating attitudes, barriers and learning needs in higher education (2025) · cites this paper as Lee et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“Lim et al. (2023) and Lee et al. (2024) note that generative AI in the education sphere provides an incredible opportunity for educators to reimagine what learning looks like, despite the notable fears of cheating, academic integrity, and plagiarism that accompany it.”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Lee et al. (2024)
In the citing paper
“Many educators and academic institutions are currently facing challenges in determining how best to incorporate these tools into their teaching methods without compromising educational values [4].”
From Engineering Educators' Perspectives on the Impact of Generative AI in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as [4]
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
S., N. L. (2017) · doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 · Cited by 14,051
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115
Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: implications in scientific writing
Alkaissi, H., & McFarlane, S. I. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.35179 · Cited by 1,540
A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020
Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2021/8812542 · Cited by 1,364
Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Cooper, G. (2023) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y · Cited by 1,263
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 · Cited by 828
Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P., & Ben Saad, H. (2023) · Biology of Sport · doi:10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 · Cited by 796
A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education
King, M. R., & chatGPT (2023) · Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering · doi:10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8 · Cited by 602
ChatGPT Goes to Law SchoolPreprint
Choi, J. H., Hickman, K. E., Monahan, A., & Schwarcz, D. B. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4335905 · Cited by 565
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Nawaz, 2020, Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for library services and resources in COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Critical Reviews, 7, 1951
- Ryznar, 2023, Exams in the time of ChatGPT, Washington and Lee Law Review Online, 80, 305
- Southern, 2023, Is ChatGPT getting “dumber”? Usage drops as users complain, Search Engine Journal
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 409
Generative AI’s impact on the assessment practices of university faculty
Kearney, S., & Wheeler, B. D. (2026) · To improve the academy · doi:10.3998/tia.7246
Generative AI Framework for Professional Development for K-12 STEM Teachers and Educators
Gulbahar, Y., & Adanır, G. A. (2026) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16157-4_10
LEARNING GAINS AND STUDENT RESERVATIONS: EVALUATING A GPT-BASED AI ASSISTANT IN GEOGRAPHY TEACHING
Drápela, E. (2026) · Public recreation and landscape protection ... · doi:10.11118/978-80-7701-087-0-0252
Muchransyah, A. P. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-1840-8.ch006
Gabelaia, I. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18104884 · Cited by 1
Aghayeva, S. (2026) · Futurity Education · doi:10.57125/fed.2026.03.10
“These results confirm the hypothesis that the old-fashioned, homogenous pedagogical methods cannot foster cognitive and sociocultural skills of the international classroom (Li and Zhang, 2022; Bobro et al., 2025; Lee et al., 2024).”
Upadhayaya, K. K. (2026) · Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research · doi:10.25082/amler.2026.02.001
Acheson, K. (2026) · New Directions for Student Leadership · doi:10.1002/yd.70062
“University faculty and staff have primarily responded to the rising use of generative AI as threats implemented Chat-GPT bans, plagiarism detection efforts, and academic integrity policies (Lee et al. 2024 ; Liang et al. 2025 ).”
Hafa, H. (2026) · Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities · doi:10.55544/ijrah.6.3.13
Tikhonova, E. A., & Raitskaya, L. (2026) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2026.33523
“…Cotton et al., 2024; Cox, 2021; Crawford et al., 2023; Firat, 2023; Heilporn et al., 2021; Jin et al., 2025; Kim et al., 2025; Kohnke et al., 2023; Lee et al., 2024; Lodge et al., 2023; Michel-Villarreal et al., 2023; Nicol, 2021; Perkins, 2023; Rapanta et al., 2021; Rasul et al., 2023; Shutaleva…”
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Faculty Performance in Delhi-NCR
Kuhar, D., Sharma, S., Kumar, P., & Rohilla, A. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on AI Innovations and Industry (ICAIII) · doi:10.1109/icaiii69475.2026.11521751
“Beyond the capacity of algorithms to mimic intelligent behaviour, assistance for humans targeted at improving results in many applications is increasing [2-3].”
The Role of Trust in the Educational Integration of Social Robots and Artificial Intelligence
Cirasa, C., Høgsdal, H., & Conti, D. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6471-1.ch015
Rojas, N. N., Tobón, S., Valdivieso-López, E. J., & Terrón, A. M. (2026) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440261430144
“Recent projections suggest that by 2030, 90% of educational interactions will occur in hybrid spaces where the distinction between in-person and virtual will become obsolete, positioning the Onlife model as the dominant paradigm of higher education (Lee et al., 2024).”
Cotrina, B., Perez, B., Wong-Durand, S., Castañeda, P., & Andino, A. O. (2026) · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.16487 · Cited by 1
Exploring human-ai interaction in academic writing: insights from translation students
Sîtnic, I. (2026) · Traducerea în era inteligenţei artificiale: provocări şi oportunităţi · doi:10.59295/teia2025.02
Khanday, M. A., & Saji, A. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6571-8.ch001
Zhu, L., & Zhang, P. (2026) · Global Education Bulletin · doi:10.71052/grb2025/ljop1169
Sloan, J. J. (2026) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2026.2684444
Effects of AI on the Trust and Confidence of Faculty Members in Submitted Academic Works by Students
Aguio, W. A., Cuerdo, R. L. C. M., Gerero, N. R., Gutierrez, S. E., Kadusale, R. P. V., & Lucero, H. R. (2026) · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science · doi:10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150500177
Experience in Implementing AI Teaching Assistants at Moscow Power Engineering Institute
Позняк, Е. В., Dogadina, T. N., Minakov, B., Tsoy, V. E., Novikova, O. V., & Stenina, T. E. (2026) · International Conference on Information Technologies in Engineering Education (Inforino) · doi:10.1109/inforino68543.2026.11556557
“A number of studies have shown that AI technologies contribute to student engagement and the effectiveness of learning professional knowledge [1-3].”
Lingling, W., Sun, S., & Liu, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1870870 · Cited by 2
“Educator-facing studies showed a mirror image, since staff see the value but worry about assessment design and student dependency (Yan et al., 2024; Lee et al., 2024).”
Mapping Stakeholder Views on Generative AI in Education: A Review of 48 Studies
Vijithasena, K., & Saarela, M. (2026) · International Conference on Information and Education Technology (ICIET) · doi:10.1109/iciet69664.2026.11561659
“Policies remain fragmented and largely risk-oriented [27], [31], [34], [35], and challenges are amplified in low-resource contexts [36], [37].”
From deskilling to reskilling: Navigating AI integration in academic practice in higher education
Hiele, T. M., Hiele, E. M., Hazarika, B., Halibas, A. S., & Ha, Q.-A. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70187
Macapas, E. A. (2026) · International Conference on Integrated Intelligence and Cognitive Engineering (ICIICE) · doi:10.1109/iciice69672.2026.11565301
“These findings suggest that AI tool usage should not be examined solely in terms of frequency of use; it must also be understood through attitudes, ethical perceptions, and context-specific study behaviors [13-15].”
General Skills Strategies in Communication by Lecturers at the Beginning of Lectures to Students
Yusuf, M., & Abdullah, O. M. (2026) · Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies · doi:10.23887/jlls.v9i1.105971
Impact of Generative AI on Undergraduate Students: A Case Study of Kyungdong University Global
Bhat, B. S., Machamasi, N., Al-Absi, M. A., & Bhandari, K. S. (2026) · Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · doi:10.21834/e-bpj.v11i37.7948
Assistive and AI-Driven Technologies for Visually Impaired Students
Suresh, C., Boopathi, L., Varadharajan, D., & Murathoti, R. N. B. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2716-5.ch004
Patel, P., Hassan, B., Yasin, A., Wasiq, M. F., Rani, M., Niaz, S., & Naveed, K. (2026) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon67543.2026.11574348
“Along the same lines, Lee et al. [28] noted a lack of studies examining long-term or program-level impacts of human–AI collaborative practices.”
A Data-Driven Roadmap for Generative AI Governance in Australian Higher Education
Singh, P. J., Sandu, N., & Goswami, B. (2026) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet69978.2026.11585127
“Sustainable use requires workload adjustments, automation, and institutional support [14]-[16].”
Adoui, A., & Deardorff, D. K. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19585-2_1
Reacting or Responding: The Impact of AI on the Delivery of Leisure-Related Courses
Pinckney, H. P., Himschoot, E. A., & Outley, C. W. (2026) · Leisure Sciences · doi:10.1080/01490400.2026.2694537
“Despite mixed adoption of Generative AI by instructors in Higher Education, they continue to seek guidance and support on appropriate and ethical use of Gen AI tools (Lee et al., 2024; Papaspyridis & Bates, 2026).”
Sun, X., Liu, D., Li, X., Gu, N., & Tian, Z. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1895365
“They are now used in content generation, intelligent interaction, personalized feedback, learning design, and assessment support, thereby reshaping teaching practices, assessment arrangements, and the role of university instructors (Lee et al., 2024; O’Dea, 2024).”
Cuarto, P. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10300970/v1
Zhang, Z. L., Lu, X., & Kanji, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2026.1863666 · Cited by 1
Li, H. P., Suo, Z., Liu, C., He, H., Wu, H., & Wider, W. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2700007
Kumar, S., & Kumar, P. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-3204-6.ch003
Afanasyev, I. V., & Afanas'eva, I. (2026) · Vestnik of Minin University · doi:10.26795/2307-1281-2026-14-2-5
Manolchev, C., & Cherrington, R. (2026) · Management Learning · doi:10.1177/13505076261462919
Biagini, G., & Ranieri, M. (2026) · EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING · doi:10.3280/exioa1-2026oa23214
Álvarez-Jiménez, M., Pomagualli, A. G. C., Gamboa, D., & Oscullo, D. S. P. (2026) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers15070466 · Cited by 1
Between awareness and compliance: AI usage patterns and ethical orientation among EFL students
Kızıl, V. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2707308
Social representations of GenAI and paradoxical tensions in its adoption in higher education
Umel, A., & Lattemann, C. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-03178-4 · Cited by 1
“Although lagging slightly behind their students in mastering these emerging technologies, university instructors are similarly utilizing GenAI to facilitate and enhance their teaching, research, and administrative responsibilities (Bharadwaj et al 2024; Lee et al 2024).”
Generative AI and Educational Inequality
Lei, L., Zhaoying, H., Huang, L., Chen, X., & Sijia, M. (2026) · Education as Change · doi:10.25159/1947-9417/21808
A framework to enhance ethical generative artificial intelligence use in academia
Chingwaro, L., & Ndlovu, L. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36775-5.00013-8
The African technological puzzle: Decolonization, AI and education
Moola, S., & Sundani, N. D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36775-5.00020-5
Evans, N. D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36775-5.00023-0
Naranjo, E. A. R., González, J. A. M., Llamuca, A. B. S., Altamirano, A. S. O., & Orozco, G. M. P. (2026) · Saber Estratégico Internacional · doi:10.70577/s.e.v4i3.34
Ong, D. P., Jr., & Madayag, J. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01263-4
Porwal, S., & Yadav, A. (2026) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.1380
An Empirical Study of Generative AI Usage in Student Data Analysis and Visualization Projects
Noonpakdee, W. (2026) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e69618.2026.11631516
“Concerns regarding academic misconduct persist, specifically "AIgiarism" (AI-assisted plagiarism) and the inability of traditional detection software to reliably identify unique, AI-generated content [8, 10, 18, 20].”
InfluentialGenerative AI in Management Education
Drahan, A., Kmeť, P., & Krajčík, M. (2026) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24048-4_14
Bowman, S., Huang, G., Ichenihi, A. M., Bowman, E., & Qiu, L. (2026) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-026-01136-8
Impact of ChatGPT Usage on Student Learning Experience: A Case Study at MAN 2 Makassar
Almaira, M., Edwin, J. A., Salsabila, M. N., Trisaputri, R., Fasel, G. R., & Khoiri (2026) · International Conference on Intelligent and Sustainable AI Systems (ICOSAAS) · doi:10.1109/icosaas68663.2026.11648492
“Moreover, there is a need for continuous monitoring and training to ensure that students are using the tool responsibly and ethically [10, 11].”
Xin, Y., Yan, D., Shuren, L., Weina, H., Deng, S., Minyang, L., & Liuheng, L. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107347 · Cited by 1
Designing with Notebooklm: An Autoethnographic Discourse Analysis of Human-AI Curriculum Design
Zapata, G. C. (2026) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.1395
Fute, A. Z., Amihere, A., & Kangwa, D. (2026) · Open Learning The Journal of Open Distance and e-Learning · doi:10.1080/02680513.2026.2722975
Elseknidy, M., Kineber, A. F., Al-Mhdawi, M. K. S., & Ibrahim, A. (2026) · International Journal of Construction Education and Research · doi:10.1080/15578771.2026.2723246
Zhang, Y., & Luo, X. (2026) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel70250.2026.11663758
A five dimensional framework for ChatGPT integration in higher education
Altrabulsi, E., Rebdawi, G., & Zoukar, I. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02120-3
“…Monitoring and Improvement [27] Readiness, Governance and Policy Pedagogical Integration, Change and Resistance, Monitoring and Improvement [29] Pedagogical Integration Readiness, Change and Resistance, Governance and Policy, Monitoring and Improvement [33] Pedagogical Integration,…”
Liu, P. (2026) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel70250.2026.11663915
“AI did not replace algorithm selection, parameter justification, or final interpretation, which is consistent with recent calls for bounded and accountable AI use in higher education [8], [9].”
Exploring Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT’s Role in Undergraduate Learning: Thematic Analysis
Sani, R. M., Zakaria, S. K., & Mallanhanse, A. K. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16265-6_29
Students’ academic-integrity anxiety in the GenAI ethical grey zone
Zainuddin, Z., Perera, C. J., Churiyah, M., & Wang, X. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2725997
Gozum, I. E. A. (2026) · International Studies in Catholic Education · doi:10.1080/19422539.2026.2725678 · Cited by 1
Hao, X., Li, J., Huang, H., & Hao, B. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18179084 · Cited by 1
Karatuna, I., Jönsson, S., & Muhonen, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1927278 · Cited by 1
“Such concerns are consistent with recent discussions on the implications of generative AI for higher education (Lee et al., 2024; Mohammadi et al., 2026; Watermeyer et al., 2024).”
Bi, T., Dalelovna, S. A., Lyu, A., & Xiu, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1890508 · Cited by 1
Agentic Generative AI in Higher Education: Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Implications for Learning
Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., Ruseva, M., Klisarova-Belcheva, S., Georgiev, P., & Totkov, G. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5040108
“Reported applications include drafting lesson plans, generating examples and cases, preparing quizzes, adapting materials, providing preliminary feedback, and summarizing recurring student difficulties [4–6, 22, 23 ].”
Fu, L., & Yan, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1958619 · Cited by 1
“Lee et al. (2024) similarly documented uncertainty among educators regarding appropriate use and institutional preparedness.”
Hsieh, H.-M., Maritz, A., & Shieh, C.-J. (2026) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/19238
Perspectivas de los docentes sobre el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa
Parra, V., Corica, A. R., Schiaffino, S., & Godoy, D. L. (2026) · Revista de Ciencias de la Comunicación e Información · doi:10.35742/rcci.2026.31.e356
Navigating the AI Frontier: Practical Insights from Faculty Perspectives in Higher Education
Muhammad, A. E. (2026) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-026-01220-2
“It confirms the recurring benefits and risks identified by Lee et al. (2024), Batista et al. (2024), Buele and Llerena-Agu-irre (2025), and Alsharefeen and Al Sayari (2025); neverthe-less, it shows that these effects are not context-neutral.”
InfluentialKosztyó, P., Burkovics, M., & Jenei, P. (2026) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/3280/1/012028
Abdelhadi, A., & Sahli, N. (2026) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.1391
Kelly, J., Gielstra, D. A., Oberding, T. J., Bruno, J., & Hadley, S. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5030100
Ni, H. (2026) · International Conference on Educational Digitalization and Computer Science in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area · doi:10.1145/3828183.3828470
Andrini, V. S., Hidayati, U., Etika, E. D., Yusuf, I., & Ulfa, S. U. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2724181
Yalçın, Y., Bakır-Yalçın, E., İslamoğlu, H., & Ursavaş, Ö. F. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70341
Thapa, D., Devkota, N., Karki, D., & Siddique, M. R. (2026) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v7ii.1388
AZZMAN, A. A., Hoon, T. S., Jamian, L. S., Yusof, M. H. M., Romeo, N., & Koo, A. C. (2026) · Studies in big data · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20412-7_5
Košatka, D., Černý, M., & Sedláková, M. (2026) · Learning Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/23735082.2026.2731922
A survey study of Cambodian university lecturers’ experiences and perceptions of AI use
Heng, K., Sok, S., Sol, K., & Sor, R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02313-w
“Such awareness is consistent with a growing body of research that has critically examined the risks and limitations of AI in teaching and learning [13, 39, 43, 61].”
Petjärv, B., Retšnoi, V., Uukkivi, A., Vilms, M., Tuisk, K., Safiulina, E., & Labanova, O. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39103-2_6
A Quantitative Visualization Study of Generative AI in Higher Education Teaching Based on CiteSpace
Zhao, X., Qin, S., Chen, G., & Sun, X. (2026) · doi:10.1145/3838921.3838925
“However, educators have not yet formed consistent perceptions of AI in higher education [5].”
Daya, H. (2026) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.25.9.14
Ngo, P. A. (2026) · International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research · doi:10.26803/ijlter.25.9.29
Perceptions of ChatGPT- and veterinarian-generated responses to pet owners’ medical questions
Griot, A., & Ward, R. (2026) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2026.1939644
Shen, N., Lee, L. S., & He, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1956939
“This shift from tool adoption to mode of engagement is consistent with recent discussions of generative AI as a creative partner rather than a simple productivity device (Lee et al., 2024; Sabbaghan and Eaton, 2025; Creely and Blannin, 2025).”
InfluentialWidyatama, R., Tawar, T., & Cheng, S. S. (2026) · AAOU Journal/AAOU journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-05-2026-0082
A Reflexive Ethnography of Digital Pedagogy in the Virtual Classroom
Chen, X., & Li, Y. (2026) · Journal of Formative Design in Learning · doi:10.1007/s41686-026-00118-9
From Policy to Practice: How HEIs Provide Guidance and Training for Generative AI in Teaching.
Tømte, C. E., Talmo, T. M., & Støckert, R. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39734-8_23
Gusman, D., Aditya, D. S., Nurmalina, & Bujdosó, G. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Information Technology and Data Science (CITDS) · doi:10.1109/citds70571.2026.11706842
“The strongest response in the literature is therefore redesign rather than prohibition alone: more process visibility, more authentic assessment, stronger AI literacy, and clearer rules about acceptable assistance [6], [8], [9].”
InfluentialEducational Approaches for Teaching Artificial Intelligence on Video Databases
Pleterski, J., Požrl, T., Podržaj, P., Selak, L., & Škulj, G. (2026) · International Conference on System Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/icsse70735.2026.11718735
“Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming a ubiquitous component of modern developed societies [1].”
Perception and Acceptance of Generative AI Tools in Software Engineering Education
Hoai, P. N. H., Nguyen, K. T., & Nguyen, L. T. (2026) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Digital Media and Education · doi:10.1145/3839592.3839682
Different forms of interaction with generative AI in higher education: a latent profile analysis
Pascual‐Soler, M., Delbello, L., de Unceta, A. D. V., & Navarro, M. D. F. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2744899
Redesigning Authentic Assessment and Feedback Practices in the Generative AI Era
Bhardwaj, S., Rana, S., Sharma, I., & Markan, R. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-8939-4.ch005
Sun, C., & ZHANG, Y. (2026) · International Conference on Sustainable Development and Digital Transformation · doi:10.1145/3838938.3838982
Lindqvist, A. L., & Quince, Z. (2026) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2026042
Mohammadipour, F., Beiranvand, M. S., & Piri-Nargeseh, R. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10641134/v1
AI-enabled assessment: framework, perspective and educational outcomes
Ogunleye, B., Olayinka, O., Zakariyyah, K. I., Ajao, O., & Sharma, H. (2026) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2026.2747507
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, D., Arnold, M., Srivastava, A., Plastow, K., Strelan, P., Ploeckl, F., Lekkas, D., & Palmer, E.
- Affiliations
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Daniel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 100221
- ISSN
- 2666-920X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4394934695
- Semantic Scholar
- 1517ab19bd54ff13f1431562c12955cc0e27ab83
- Cited by
- 402
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 195 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 42
- FWCI
- 151.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
- Keywords
- generative AI, higher education, teacher perceptions, academic integrity, AI in teaching, assessment design, faculty readiness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
