Cited by 221Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Data Visualization and AnalyticsComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

A survey of visual analytics for Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods

Alicioglu, Gulsum, Sun, Bo·2022·Computers & Graphics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cag.2021.09.002

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alicioglu, G., & Sun, B.
Affiliations
Rowan University (US)
Venue
Computers & Graphics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
102
Pages
502-520
ISSN
0097-8493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199384803
Cited by
221
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 1
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers & Graphics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
visual analytics, explainable AI, deep learning interpretability, model visualization, black-box models, neural network interpretation, explainable deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review