Cited by 582Data Visualization and AnalyticsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontiers

Open access
Hohman, Fred, Kahng, Minsuk, Pienta, Robert, Chau, Duen Horng·2019·IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Abstract

Deep learning has recently seen rapid development and received significant attention due to its state-of-the-art performance on previously-thought hard problems. However, because of the internal complexity and nonlinear structure of deep neural networks, the underlying decision making processes for why these models are achieving such performance are challenging and sometimes mystifying to interpret. As deep learning spreads across domains, it is of paramount importance that we equip users of deep learning with tools for understanding when a model works correctly, when it fails, and ultimately how to improve its performance. Standardized toolkits for building neural networks have helped democratize deep learning; visual analytics systems have now been developed to support model explanation, interpretation, debugging, and improvement. We present a survey of the role of visual analytics in deep learning research, which highlights its short yet impactful history and thoroughly summarizes the state-of-the-art using a human-centered interrogative framework, focusing on the Five W's and How (Why, Who, What, How, When, and Where). We conclude by highlighting research directions and open research problems. This survey helps researchers and practitioners in both visual analytics and deep learning to quickly learn key aspects of this young and rapidly growing body of research, whose impact spans a diverse range of domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvcg.2018.2843369

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selecting an appropriate XAI method for a given task is challenging because of subjective end-user perceptions, individual needs, and sparse assessment guidelines.

    “Because of that, selecting an appropriate XAI method for the task at hand remains a challenge, especially considering the subjective perceptions of end-users alongside their individual needs [18,19] and relatively sparse assessment guidelines.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [26]Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, and Courville A, Deep Learning MIT Press, 2016, http://www.deeplearningbook.org.
  2. [33]Cashman D, Patterson G, Mosca A, and Chang R, “ RNNbow: Visualizing learning via backpropagation gradients in recurrent neural networks,” in Workshop on Visual Analytics for Deep Learning, 2017.
  3. [34]Chae J, Gao S, Ramanthan A, Steed C, and Tourassi GD, “ Visualization for classification in deep neural networks,” in Workshop on Visual Analytics for Deep Learning, 2017.
  4. [35]Chung S, Park C, Suh S, Kang K, Choo J, and Kwon BC, “ ReVACNN: Steering convolutional neural network via real-time visual analytics,” in NIPS Workshop on Future of Interactive Learning Machines, 2016.
  5. [50]Rong X and Adar E, “ Visual tools for debugging neural language models,” in ICML Workshop on Vis for Deep Learning, 2016.
  6. [58]Zhong W, Xie C, Zhong Y, Wang Y, Xu W, Cheng S, and Mueller K, “ Evolutionary visual analysis of deep neural networks,” in ICML Workshop on Vis for Deep Learning, 2017.
  7. [67]Li L, Tompkin J, Michalatos P, and Pfister H, “ Hierarchical visual feature analysis for city street view datasets,” in Workshop on Visual Analytics for Deep Learning, 2017.
  8. [68]Erhan D, Bengio Y, Courville A, and Vincent P, “ Visualizing higher-layer features of a deep network,” University of Montreal, vol. 1341, 2009.
  9. [69]Selvaraju RR, Das A, Vedantam R, Cogswell M, Parikh D, and Batra D, “ Grad-CAM: Why did you say that? visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization,” arXiv:1610.02391, 2016. · arXiv
  10. [70]Nguyen A, Dosovitskiy A, Yosinski J, Brox T, and Clune J, “ Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networks,” in NIPS, 2016.
  11. [106]Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, Xu B, Warde-Farley D, Ozair S, Courville A, and Bengio Y, “ Generative adversarial nets,” in NIPS, 2014.
  12. [111]Tsai C-Y and Cox DD, “ Characterizing visual representations within convolutional neural networks: Toward a quantitative approach,” ICML Workshop on Vis for Deep Learning, 2016.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hohman, F., Kahng, M., Pienta, R., & Chau, D. H.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
2674-2693
ISSN
  • 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0506
  • 2160-9306
OpenAlex
W2784769278
Cited by
582
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 23
FWCI
35.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • NSF (IIS-1563816, CNS-1704701, TWC-1526254, DGE-1650044)
  • NIBIB (U54EB020404)
  • NASA
  • Intel Corporation
  • Google
  • Symantec
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
visual analytics, deep learning, model interpretability, model explanation, human-centered design, open problems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review