Cited by 155Food composition and propertiesGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Studies on nutritional intervention of rice starch- oleic acid complex (resistant starch type V) in rats fed by high-fat diet

Abstract

In this study, rice starch-oleic acid complex with well-controlled digestibility was chosen as a supplementary diet for rats fed with high fat diet. Our results demonstrated that rice starch-oleic acid complex supplementation significantly decreased body weight, improved serum lipid profiles, hepatic metabolism and altered the composition of gut microbiota of rats, which might be related to the higher resistant starch (RS) level. Interestingly, rice starch-oleic acid complex supplementation contributed to the proliferation and growth of butyrate-producing bacteria. The Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that the genus Turicibacter and Romboutsia genus were positively correlated to HDL-c and SOD level. Meanwhile, based on the metagenomic data, Bifidobacteria genus might be a main primary degrader after rice starch-oleic acid complex intake, which was associated with the changes of key starch-degradation enzymes. Overall, our results provided basic data for the rational design of rice starch-based foods with nutritional functions and physiological benefits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116637

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, B., Wang, T., Wang, H., Chen, L., & Zhou, Z.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Green Processing of Natural Products and Product Safety (CN)
  • Key Laboratory of Guangdong Province (CN)
  • Tianjin University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Ling
Venue
Carbohydrate Polymers
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
246
Pages
116637
ISSN
0144-8617 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035231856
Cited by
155
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 2
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Carbohydrate Polymers (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1501214)
  • Guangzhou Science and Technology Program key projects (201607010109, 31871751)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
high-fat diet, body weight, lipid profile, hepatic metabolism, gut microbiota, butyrate-producing bacteria, Turicibacter, Romboutsia, Bifidobacterium, amylolytic enzymes, superoxide dismutase, HDL cholesterol, dietary supplementation
MeSH terms
Bacillota, Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Resistant Starch, Animals, Butyrates, DNA, Bacterial, Glutathione Peroxidase, Cholesterol, LDL, Liver, Male, Obesity, Phylogeny, Superoxide Dismutase, Gene Expression, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Oleic Acid, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Lipid Metabolism, Rats, Diet, High-Fat

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review