Cited by 95Click Chemistry and ApplicationsSulfur-Based Synthesis TechniquesLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations

Covalent targeting of acquired cysteines in cancer

Open access
Visscher, Marieke, Arkin, Michelle R, Dansen, Tobias B·2016·Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Abstract

The thiolate side chain of cysteine has a unique functionality that drug hunters and chemical biologists have begun to exploit. For example, targeting cysteine residues in the ATP-binding pockets of kinases with thiol-reactive molecules has afforded increased selectivity and potency to drugs like imbrutinib, which inhibits the oncogene BTK, and CO-1686 and AZD9291 that target oncogenic mutant EGFR. Recently, disulfide libraries and targeted GDP-mimetics have been used to selectively label the G12C oncogenic mutation in KRAS. We reasoned that other oncogenes contain mutations to cysteine, and thus screened the Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer for frequently acquired cysteines. Here, we describe the most common mutations and discuss how these mutations could be potential targets for cysteine-directed personalized therapeutics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.11.004

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visscher, M., Arkin, M. R., & Dansen, T. B.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
  • Arkin, Michelle R
  • Dansen, Tobias B
Venue
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
30
Pages
61-67
ISSN
1367-5931 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2187318534
Cited by
95
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch Cancer Society
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Keywords
somatic mutations, oncogenic mutations, kinase inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, EGFR inhibitors, KRAS G12C, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Cysteine, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review