Cited by 466Click Chemistry and ApplicationsChemical Synthesis and AnalysisComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Site-directed ligand discovery

Open access
Erlanson, Daniel A., Braisted, Andrew C., Raphael, Darren R., Randal, Mike, Stroud, Robert M., Gordon, Eric M., Wells, James A.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

We report a strategy (called “tethering”) to discover low molecular weight ligands (≈250 Da) that bind weakly to targeted sites on proteins through an intermediary disulfide tether. A native or engineered cysteine in a protein is allowed to react reversibly with a small library of disulfide-containing molecules (≈1,200 compounds) at concentrations typically used in drug screening (10 to 200 μM). The cysteine-captured ligands, which are readily identified by MS, are among the most stable complexes, even though in the absence of the covalent tether the ligands may bind very weakly. This method was applied to generate a potent inhibitor for thymidylate synthase, an essential enzyme in pyrimidine metabolism with therapeutic applications in cancer and infectious diseases. The affinity of the untethered ligand ( K i ≈1 mM) was improved 3,000-fold by synthesis of a small set of analogs with the aid of crystallographic structures of the tethered complex. Such site-directed ligand discovery allows one to nucleate drug design from a spatially targeted lead fragment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.97.17.9367

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2013, Shokat and co-workers discovered a strategy using covalent inhibitors to bind to the cysteine of KRASG12C mutation and screened out lead compounds 6H05 and 2E07 using tethering.

    “In 2013, Shokat and co-workers discovered a new strategy where they used covalent inhibitors to bind to the cysteine of KRASG12C mutation, and screened out two lead compounds, 6H05 (17) and 2E07 (18), by utilizing “tethering” technique.47,85,86”
  • Tethering uses libraries of compounds linked to disulfides to identify fragments that bind cysteine-adjacent pockets.

    “Originally, MS-based compound screening grew out of ‘tethering’, which is a technique employed since 2000 that uses libraries of compounds linked to disulfides to identify fragments that bind cysteine-adjacent pockets90,147.”

    From Advances in covalent drug discovery (2022) · cites this paper as [147]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]Santi D V, Danenberg P V. In: Chemistry and Biology of Folates. Blakley R L, Benkovic S J, editors. I. New York: Wiley; 1984. pp. 345–398. [Google Scholar]
  2. [3]Kamen B. Semin Oncol. 1997;5 Suppl 18:S30–S39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. [13]Wahba A L, Friedkin M. J Biol Chem. 1961;263:PC11–PC12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. [18]Collaborative Computational Project N. Acta Crystallogr D. 1994;50:760–763. [Google Scholar]
  5. [29]Glick G D, Toogood P L, Wiley D C, Skehel J J, Knowles J R. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:23660–23669. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. [33]Hajduk P J, Sheppard G, Nettesheim D G, Olejniczak E T, Shuker S B, Meadows R P, Steinman D H, Carrera G M, Marcotte P A, Severin J, et al. J Am Chem Soc. 1997;119:5818–5827. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Erlanson, D. A., Braisted, A. C., Raphael, D. R., Randal, M., Stroud, R. M., Gordon, E. M., & Wells, J. A.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Erlanson, Daniel A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-08-15
Volume
97
Issue
17
Pages
9367-9372
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2150996942
Cited by
466
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 20
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Small Business Innovation Research
  • National Institutes of Health (1r43ca085141-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (1 R43 CA85141-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
low molecular weight ligands, thymidylate synthase, enzyme inhibitors, pyrimidine metabolism, affinity enhancement
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Cysteine, Disulfides, Escherichia coli, Ligands, Models, Molecular, Molecular Weight, Proline, Protein Conformation, Thermodynamics, Thymidylate Synthase, Drug Design, Protein Engineering, Crystallography, X-Ray, Glutamic Acid, Peptide Library, Amino Acid Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review