Cited by 87Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Perceived perpetration during traumatic events: Clinical suggestions from experts in Prolonged Exposure therapy

Smith, Erin R., Duax, Jeanne M., Rauch, Sheila A.M.·2013·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.12.002

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E. R., Duax, J. M., & Rauch, S. A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Erin R.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
461-470
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047942442
Cited by
87
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
5.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
prolonged exposure therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, war injuries, guilt, shame, trauma survivors, lethal force, use of violence, clinical evaluation, trauma-related guilt

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review