Cited by 82Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchSleep and related disordersPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Using Prolonged Exposure and Cognitive Processing Therapy to treat veterans with moral injury-based PTSD: Two case examples

Open access
Held, Philip, Klassen, Brian J., Brennan, Michael B., Zalta, Alyson K.·2018·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

Moral injury refers to acts of commission or omission that violate individuals' moral or ethical standards. Morally injurious events are often synonymous with psychological trauma, especially in combat situations; thus, morally injurious events are often implicated in the development of PTSD for military service members and veterans. Although Prolonged Exposure (PE) and Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) have been well-established as effective treatments for veterans who are struggling with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it has been suggested that these two evidence-based therapies may not be sufficient for treating veterans whose PTSD resulted from morally injurious events. The purpose of this manuscript is to detail how the underlying theories of PE and CPT can account for moral-injury based PTSD and to describe two case examples of veterans with PTSD stemming from morally injurious events who were successfully treated with PE and CPT. The manuscript concludes with a summary of challenges that clinicians may face when treating veterans with PTSD resulting from moral injury using either PE or CPT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.09.003

Cites

47 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Standard evidence-based PTSD interventions show only modest symptom reduction among individuals exposed to morally injurious events.

    “Standard evidence-based interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have shown, across case studies and secondary analyses, only modest symptom reduction among individuals exposed to morally injurious events (24–26).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports significant PTSD and depression symptom reductions in both veterans treated with PE or CPT for moral injury-based PTSD, rather than only modest reductions. The paper also says that whether frontline treatments are less successful for moral injury-based PTSD had not been explicitly tested. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. MacNair RM 2015 Causing trauma as a form of trauma Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 21 3 313 321 10.1037/pac0000116 · DOI
  2. Steenkamp MM Nash WP Lebowitz L Litz BT 2013 How best to treat deployment-related guilt and shame: Commentary on Smith, Duax, and Rauch (2013) Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 20 4 471 475 10.1016/j.cbpra.2013.05.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Held, P., Klassen, B. J., Brennan, M. B., & Zalta, A. K.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Held, Philip
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
377-390
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2763686886
Cited by
82
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
6.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH103394)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
moral injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, prolonged exposure therapy, cognitive processing therapy, war injuries, treatment challenges, case examples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review