Cited by 52Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentEmotions and Moral Behavior

‘I knew it was wrong the moment I got the order’: A narrative thematic analysis of moral injury in combat veterans

Open access
Held, Philip, Klassen, Brian J., Hall, Joanne M., Friese, Tanya R., Bertsch-Gout, Marcel M., Zalta, Alyson K., Pollack, Mark H.·2019·Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Moral injury is a nascent construct intended to capture reactions to events that violate deeply held beliefs and moral values. Although a model of moral injury has been proposed, many of the theoretical propositions of this model have yet to be systematically studied. METHOD: We conducted semistructured interviews with eight veterans who reported experiencing morally injurious events during war zone deployments. RESULTS: Using narrative thematic analysis, five main themes and associated subthemes emerged from the data. The main themes capture the timing of the event, contextual factors that affected the decision-making process during the morally injurious event, reactions to the moral injurious event, search for purpose and meaning, and opening up. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present study supported an existing model of moral injury, while extending it in several important ways. Preliminary clinical recommendations and directions for future research are discussed based on the study findings. These include directly exploring the context surrounding the morally injurious event, examining the veterans' moral appraisals, and helping them assume appropriate responsibility for their actions to reduce excessive self-blame. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/tra0000364

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MI-related distress is sustained by maladaptive self-referential processing, including recurrent rumination, rigid moral self-appraisal, and self-condemning narratives.

    “Recent empirical and theoretical literature suggests that MI-related distress is sustained by maladaptive self-referential processing—recurrent rumination, rigid moral self-appraisal, and self-condemning narratives that reorganize identity around perceived transgression or betrayal (8, 10, 15–18).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Held, P., Klassen, B. J., Hall, J. M., Friese, T. R., Bertsch-Gout, M. M., Zalta, A. K., & Pollack, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
Published
2019-05
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
396-405
ISSN
  • 1942-9681 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-969X
OpenAlex
W2802024423
Cited by
52
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cohn Family Foundation
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH103394)
  • Brain and Behavior Foundation, and the Illinois Department
  • Wounded Warrior Project
  • National Institute of Health
  • Edgemont Pharmaceuticals
  • Jannsen
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
moral injury, combat veterans, moral judgment, self-blame, moral responsibility, meaning-making, moral values, military ethics
MeSH terms
War Exposure, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Alcoholism, Decision Making, Hierarchy, Social, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Stress, Psychological, Veterans, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review