Cited by 46Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Developing an acceptance-based behavioral treatment for binge eating disorder: rationale and challenges

Open access
Juarascio, Adrienne S., Manasse, Stephanie M., Schumacher, Leah, Espel, Hallie, Forman, Evan M.·2017·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Abstract

Binge eating disorder (BED), characterized by recurrent eating episodes in which individuals eat an objectively large amount of food within a short time period accompanied by a sense of loss of control, is the most common eating disorder. While existing treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), produce remission in a large percentage of individuals with BED, room for improvement in outcomes remains. Two reasons some patients may continue to experience binge eating after a course of treatment are: (a) Difficulty complying with the prescribed behavioral components of CBT due to the discomfort of implementing such strategies; and (b) a lack of focus in current treatments on strategies for coping with high levels of negative affect that often drive binge eating. To optimize treatment outcomes, it is therefore crucial to provide patients with strategies to overcome these issues. A small but growing body of research suggests that acceptance-based treatment approaches may be effective for the treatment of binge eating. The goal of the current paper is to describe the development of an acceptance-based group treatment for BED, discuss the structure of the manual and the rationale and challenges associated with integrating acceptance-based strategies into a CBT protocol, and to discuss clinical strategies for successfully implementing the intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.12.005

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low DT has become a key treatment target across both traditional and novel treatment approaches for EDs-B/P.

    “As a result, low DT has become a key treatment target across both traditional and novel treatment approaches for EDs-B/P (Fairburn et al., 2003;Juarascio et al., 2017;Kamody et al., 2020), and one hypothesised mechanism underpinning the co-occurrence between EDs-B/P and other types of impulsive-type psychopathology (Kim and Hodgins, 2018).”

    From Distress tolerance across substance use, eating, and borderline personality disorders: A meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Juarascio et al., 2017

    The Abstract and Acceptance-Based Strategies section describe distress tolerance as a focus of the proposed treatment for binge eating disorder (BED), and note that CBT-E addresses mood intolerance to a lesser extent. The paper does not establish that low distress tolerance is a key target across traditional and novel treatments for the broader range of binge/purge eating disorders; its treatment study included only people with BED. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hayes SC Strosahl KD Wilson KG 2012 Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change 2nd New York, NY Guilford Press
  2. Linehan MM 1993 Cognitive behavioral therapy of borderline personality disorder New York, NY Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Juarascio, A. S., Manasse, S. M., Schumacher, L., Espel, H., & Forman, E. M.
Affiliations
Drexel University (US)
Corresponding author
Juarascio, Adrienne S.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2275418752
Cited by
46
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH105680)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
binge eating disorder, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, group therapy, treatment manual development, treatment implementation, negative affect, medication adherence, eating disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review