Cited by 134Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Meta-analysis of the effects of third-wave behavioural interventions on disordered eating and body image concerns: Implications for eating disorder prevention

Open access
Linardon, Jake, Gleeson, John, Yap, Keong, Murphy, Kylie, Brennan, Leah·2019·Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

Abstract

Third-wave behavioural interventions are increasingly popular for treating and preventing mental health conditions. Recently, researchers have begun testing whether these interventions can effectively targeting eating disorder risk factors (disordered eating, body image concerns). This meta-analysis examined whether third-wave behavioural interventions (acceptance and commitment therapy; dialectical behaviour therapy; mindfulness-based interventions; compassion-focused therapy) show potential for being effective eating disorder prevention programs, by testing their effects on eating disorder risk factors in samples without an eating disorder. Twenty-four studies (13 randomized trials) were included. Most studies delivered selective prevention programs (i.e. participants who reported elevated risk factor). Third-wave interventions led to significant pre-post (g = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.43, 0.75) and follow-up (g = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.38, 1.28) improvements in disordered eating, and significant pre-post improvements in body image (g = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.13, 0.56). DBT-based interventions were associated with the largest effects. Third-wave interventions were also significantly more efficacious than wait-lists (g = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.69) in reducing disordered eating, but did not differ to other interventions (g = 0.25; 95% CI = -0.06, 0.57). Preliminary evidence suggests that third-wave interventions may have a beneficial effect in ameliorating eating disorder risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/16506073.2018.1517389

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Linardon, J., Gleeson, J., Yap, K., Murphy, K., & Brennan, L.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Centre for Eating, Weight and Body Image, Melbourne, Australia
Corresponding author
Linardon, Jake
Venue
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
Published
2018-10-11
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
15-38
ISSN
  • 1650-6073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2316
OpenAlex
W2897259731
Cited by
134
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
eating disorder prevention, disordered eating, body image concern, acceptance and commitment therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, mindfulness-based interventions, compassion-focused therapy, eating disorder risk factors
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Body Image, Humans, Body Dysmorphic Disorders, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review