Cited by 172Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Moral injury and PTSD: Often co-occurring yet mechanistically different

Open access
Barnes, Haleigh A., Hurley, Robin A., Taber, Katherine H.·2019·The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19020036

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTSD and moral injury are conceptually distinct: PTSD is defined by fear-based responses to life threat, whereas moral injury centers on transgressions of deeply held moral beliefs and disrupted moral meaning.

    “While Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and moral injury (MI) often co-occur, both are conceptually distinct: PTSD is defined by fear-based responses to life threat (e.g., hyperarousal, re-experiencing, and avoidance of trauma cues), whereas MI centers on transgressions of deeply held moral beliefs and is marked disrupted moral meaning (10, 14, 19).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

    The paper’s main text (page unavailable) distinguishes moral injury from PTSD and links moral injury to transgressions of deeply held beliefs and disruptions to a person’s belief system. It says PTSD has been conceptualized as fear-based, but also reports PTSD arising from events that do not primarily evoke fear or threat. Thus, describing PTSD as defined by fear-based responses to life threat is too restrictive. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MI-related distress is sustained by maladaptive self-referential processing, including recurrent rumination, rigid moral self-appraisal, and self-condemning narratives.

    “Recent empirical and theoretical literature suggests that MI-related distress is sustained by maladaptive self-referential processing—recurrent rumination, rigid moral self-appraisal, and self-condemning narratives that reorganize identity around perceived transgression or betrayal (8, 10, 15–18).”

    From The therapeutic role of self-transcendence in moral injury recovery: theory, mechanisms, and clinical implications (2026) · cites this paper as [10]

    The paper’s main text describes guilt, shame, self-blame, and lack of self-forgiveness as self-referential features of moral injury, and says unresolved internal conflicts can exacerbate mental-health symptoms. It does not specifically identify recurrent rumination, rigid moral self-appraisal, or self-condemning narratives as the processes sustaining that distress. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Moral injury is distinct from PTSD and is not fully captured by fear-based trauma models.

    “Although MI often co-occurs with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), it is widely understood as a distinct moral–psychological condition not fully captured by fear-based trauma models”
  • Moral injury is a distinct psychosocial syndrome involving enduring disruptions in moral identity, meaning systems, and self-evaluative processes following exposure to potentially morally injurious events.

    “MI is increasingly conceptualized as a distinct psychosocial syndrome involving enduring disruptions in moral identity, meaning systems, and self-evaluative processes following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (4, 8–13).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [11]11. Griffin BJ, Purcell N, Burkman K, et al: Moral injury: an in- tegrative review. J Trauma Stress(Epub ahead of print, January 28, 2019)
  2. [17]17. Maguen S, Litz B: Moral injury in veterans of war. PTSD Res Quarterly 2012; 23:1-6
  3. [36]36. Farnsworth J, Drescher K, Nieuwsma J, et al: The role of moral emotions in military trauma. Rev Gen Psychiatry. 2014; 18:249-262

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, H. A., Hurley, R. A., & Taber, K. H.
Affiliations
W. G. (Bill) Hefner VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
Published
2019-04
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
A4-103
ISSN
  • 0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7222
OpenAlex
W2942372106
Cited by
172
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
moral injury, post-traumatic stress disorder, co-occurrence, pathophysiological mechanisms
MeSH terms
Psychological Trauma, Combat Disorders, Humans, Morals, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Forgiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review