Cited by 383Advanced Breast Cancer TherapiesPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

CDK4/6 Inhibitors: The Mechanism of Action May Not Be as Simple as Once Thought

Open access
Klein, Mary E., Kovatcheva, Marta, Davis, Lara E., Tap, William D., Koff, Andrew·2018·Cancer Cell

Abstract

CDK4/6 inhibitors are among a new generation of therapeutics. Building upon the striking success of the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and the hormone receptor antagonist letrozole in breast cancer, many other combinations have recently entered clinical trials in multiple diseases. To achieve maximal benefit with CDK4/6 inhibitors it will be critical to understand the cellular mechanisms by which they act. Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest, and discuss how this knowledge may inform new combinations, improve outcomes, and modify dosing schedules in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.03.023

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 92 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    In vitro, abemaciclib and ribociclib are more potent against CDK4 than CDK6.

    “In vitro studies using cyclin D1/CDK4 and various cyclin D/CDK6 kinases determined that both abemaciclib and ribociclib are more potent against CDK4 than CDK6 (Gelbert et al., 2014; Tripathy et al., 2017) (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gelbert et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tripathy et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationnone given

    CDK4/6 inhibitors can produce anti-tumor effects that go beyond merely causing cytostatic growth arrest.

    “Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor action observed in preclinical models are relevant to their clinical effects in human cancers.
  • Premisecitation

    Pan-CDK inhibitors had limited clinical success, partly because dose-limiting toxicities restricted their use.

    “Such pan-CDK inhibitors had limited success, due in part to the dose limiting toxicities that hampered their use (Asghar et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Asghar et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    CDK4/6 activity connects extracellular signaling pathways to the cell cycle.

    “CDK4/6 activity bridges numerous extracellular signaling pathways to the cell cycle (Sherr and Roberts, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sherr and Roberts, 1999 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Palbociclib was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor to show clinical efficacy.

    “Although palbociclib was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor to demonstrate clinical efficacy (Finn et al., 2016), there are two others that soon followed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Finn et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 28
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Ribociclib achieves high maximum plasma concentrations exceeding 2 μg/ml and has a half-life greater than 30 hours.

    “Ribociclib is notable for achieving high maximum plasma concentrations (exceeding 2 µg/ml) with a long half-life (greater than 30 hours).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    All three CDK4/6 inhibitors are orally available but differ in pharmacokinetics and clinical toxicities, requiring different dosing strategies.

    “All three CDK4/6 inhibitors are orally available, but each has differing pharmacokinetics and clinical toxicities (Table 1), necessitating different dosing strategies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Table 1

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    In normal and many transformed tumor cells, commitment to the mitotic cycle occurs in G1 and requires phosphorylation and inactivation of Rb.

    “Both non-immortal non-transformed cells (hereafter referred to as ‘normal’ cells) and many transformed tumor cells commit irreversibly to the mitotic cell cycle in the G1 phase. Commitment depends on the phosphorylation and inactivation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, Rb.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Quiescent CDK4/6 inhibitor-arrested liposarcoma cells are pushed into senescence by HRAS knockdown, and near-physiologic HRAS mRNA expression prevents senescence after CDK4/6 inhibition while cells still exit the cell cycle.

    “Indeed, quiescent CDK4/6 inhibitor arrested liposarcoma tumor cells are pushed into senescence upon knocking down HRAS, and enforced expression of near physiologic levels of HRAS mRNA is able to prevent cells from undergoing senescence following treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors albeit they still exit the cell cycle (Kovatcheva 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kovatcheva 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The choice between quiescence and senescence may be an important consideration when deciding between abemaciclib and palbociclib/ribociclib because of their differing dosing schedules.

    “This outcome may be an important consideration when deciding whether to treat with abemaciclib or palbociclib/ribociclib, given their differing dosing schedules.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Abemaciclib is better tolerated overall, with 55% of patients having significant adverse events versus 70-80% for ribociclib and palbociclib, and only 21% having grade 3-4 neutropenia.

    “Abemaciclib appears to be better tolerated overall, with only 55% of patients experiencing significant adverse events (as compared to 70–80% with ribociclib and palbociclib) and only 21% with grade 3–4 neutropenia.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Asghar et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hortobagyi et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SASP can recruit immune cells that mediate tumor clearance or promote paracrine senescence.

    “On one hand, the SASP can induce the recruitment of immune cells that will mediate tumor clearance (Xue et al., 2007), or promote paracrine senescence (Acosta et al., 2013; Acosta et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Xue et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Acosta et al., 2013 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Acosta et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    About 10% of patients treated with abemaciclib develop grade 3 diarrhea, which is very rare with the other two inhibitors.

    “However, 10% of the patients treated with abemaciclib develop grade 3 diarrhea, which is very rare with the other two inhibitors (Asghar et al., 2015; Hortobagyi et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Asghar et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hortobagyi et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    mTOR can toggle the decision between quiescence and senescence.

    “It has also been suggested that the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) can toggle the decision between quiescence and senescence (Korotchkina et al., 2010; Leontieva et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Korotchkina et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Leontieva et al., 2012 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Because of significant myelotoxicity, palbociclib and ribociclib require dose interruption and are given on a three-weeks-on/one-week-off schedule to allow marrow recovery.

    “Due to the significant myelotoxicity of palbociclib and ribociclib, both drugs require dose-interruption and are administered on a three-weeks-on / one-week-off schedule to allow marrow recovery.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Knockdown of FOXM1 does not fully reproduce the senescence caused by CDK4/6 inhibition, suggesting that CDK4/6 inhibitors have additional functions beyond FOXM1 suppression.

    “Nevertheless, knockdown of FOXM1 does not completely recapitulate the senescence effect of CDK4/6 inhibition, suggesting CDK4/6 inhibitors have functions in addition to suppression of FOXM1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    mTOR inhibition is crucial for oncogene-induced senescence in mouse melanoma models, and mTOR inhibition can cooperate with CDK4/6 inhibition to drive senescence in melanoma cell lines.

    “In contrast to this however, mTOR inhibition is crucial to reach oncogene induced senescence in mouse models of melanoma, and mTOR inhibition can cooperate with CDK4/6 inhibition to drive senescence in melanoma cell lines (Damsky et al., 2015; Yoshida et al., 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Damsky et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Yoshida et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unlike quiescent cells, senescent cells do not re-enter the cell cycle after removal of the inducing signal and are generally refractory to other proliferation-inducing signals.

    “Unlike quiescent cells, senescent cells will not return to the cell cycle following removal of the inducing signal and are generally refractory to other proliferation-inducing signals (Rodier and Campisi, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rodier and Campisi, 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CDK4/6 inhibition leads to loss of multi-site phosphorylation and destabilization of FOXM1.

    “CDK4/6 inhibition leads to the loss of multi-site phosphorylation and the destabilization of the transcription factor Forkhead Box M1 (FOXM1) (Anders et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anders et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    CDK4/6 inhibition can alter cellular metabolism, deplete antioxidants, increase reactive oxygen species, and trigger apoptosis.

    “CDK4/6 inhibition can also alter cellular metabolism, depleting antioxidants, increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and triggering apoptosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    All three inhibitors target the proliferative function of cyclin D-associated kinases in Rb-positive tumor cells to induce cell cycle exit and are largely inactive in Rb-negative cells.

    “In summary, all three inhibitors target the proliferative function of the cyclin D associated kinases in Rb positive tumor cells to induce cell cycle exit and they are largely inactive in Rb negative cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rodent models indicate strong efflux of palbociclib from the central nervous system and less efflux of abemaciclib.

    “Other rodent models indicate a strong efflux of palbociclib out of the central nervous system, and less so for abemaciclib (Raub et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Raub et al., 2015 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    CDK4/6 inhibition can affect maturation of sentinel immune cells and expansion of regulatory T-cells.

    “CDK4/6 inhibition can also affect both the maturation of sentinel cells of the immune system and the expansion of regulatory T-cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    T-ALL cells express very low levels of cyclin D1, cyclin D2, and CDK4, and their proliferative decision depends on cyclin D3 and CDK6.

    “These cells express very low levels of cyclin D1, cyclin D2, and CDK4, and the proliferative decision is dependent upon cyclin D3 and CDK6 (Wang et al., 2017; Wolowiec et al., 1996).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Wolowiec et al., 1996 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CDK4 phosphorylation of GCN5 can lead to PGC-1α acetylation and is associated with decreased glucose metabolism in hepatic cells.

    “In contrast, CDK4 phosphorylation of GCN5 can lead to acetylation of PGC-1α and is associated with decreased glucose metabolism in hepatic cells (Lee et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2014 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Combining CDK4/6 inhibition with an mTOR inhibitor, a BCL2 inhibitor, or reducing ROS scavengers drives pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells into apoptosis, whereas single agents alone are insufficient.

    “Combining CDK4/6 inhibition with an mTOR inhibitor, a BCL2 inhibitor, or reducing the ROS scavengers drives these cells into apoptosis, whereas treatment with single agents alone is not sufficient.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Franco et al., 2016 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    CDK4 is required for both tumor cell proliferation and maturation of the tumor microenvironment, and both are necessary for disease progression in this model.

    “Thus, CDK4 is required for both the proliferation of tumor cells and for the maturation of the tumor microenvironment, and both are necessary for the progression of disease in this model.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Persistent senescent cells may contribute to detrimental short- and long-term side effects of treatment, as well as to metastases and relapse.

    “Indeed, persistent senescent cells may contribute to detrimental short and long-term side effects of treatment, as well as to metastases and relapse (Demaria et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Demaria et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Treatment raises the count of CD3+ cells that enter the tumor mass, enabling cytotoxic T-cell stimulation.

    “Consistent with this, the number of CD3+ cells recruited into the tumor mass increases after treatment, allowing for the stimulation of cytotoxic T-cells (CTLs).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Goel et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Changes in metabolism after CDK4/6 inhibition are likely context-specific and may depend on oncogenic drivers that set up unique metabolic pathways and vulnerabilities.

    “It is likely that the changes in metabolism after CDK4/6 inhibition will be context-specific and may be dependent on the oncogenic drivers that set up unique metabolic pathways and vulnerabilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The tumor microenvironment can drive the transition of slow-growing, indolent tumors into a more aggressive state.

    “The extraordinarily complex microenvironment is not only supportive for growth but can also drive the transition of slow growing, indolent tumors into a more aggressive state.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This phosphorylation pushes glycolytic intermediates into the pentose phosphate and serine pathways, and CDK6 inhibition depletes NADPH and glutathione, increasing ROS and apoptosis.

    “This has the effect of pushing glycolytic intermediates into the pentose phosphate and serine pathways, and inhibition of CDK6 (through treatment with palbociclib, ribociclib, or knockdown of CDK6) depletes the antioxidants NADPH and glutathione, increasing ROS and apoptosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In vitro, blocking CDK4/6 activates T cells that express PD-1 and increases T-cell infiltration.

    “CDK4/6 inhibition is also able to stimulate PD-1 expressing T-cells in vitro and enhance T cell infiltration (Deng et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Deng et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Combined CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibition raises HLA antigen levels, which is accompanied by increased tumor infiltration by cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells and reduced CD4+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells.

    “the combination of CDK4/6 and PI3K inhibitors increases the expression of HLA antigens leading to an increase in tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and natural killer cells, and a decrease in the CD4+FOXP3+ Treg suppressor cells (Teo et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Teo et al., 2017 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Palbociclib treatment inhibits SPOP phosphorylation, promotes SPOP degradation, and blocks proteasome-mediated degradation of PD-L1.

    “Treatment with palbociclib inhibits SPOP phosphorylation, promoting its degradation and blocking PD-L1 proteasome mediated degradation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2018 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The most effective way to harness the senescence-promoting effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors may be to first induce senescence and then eliminate persistent senescent cells.

    “Collectively, these observations suggest that the most effective approach to harness the senescence promoting effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors may be to first induce senescence and then eliminate the persistent senescent cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The senescence and SASP programs induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors in model systems are representative of those in human tumors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationcitation

    Combining BCL2 inhibitors with other cancer therapies in a sequential manner might be useful.

    “Evidence that BCL2 inhibitors can directly eliminate senescent cells (Chang et al., 2016; Yosef et al., 2016) suggests that combining this with other cancer therapies in a sequential manner might be useful.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In an oligodendroglioma model, PDGF overexpression can start disease in tumor cells with CDK4, but CDK4 deficiency in the microenvironment prevents low-grade lesions from becoming high-grade lethal malignancies.

    “In the oligodendroglioma model described above (Ciznadija et al., 2011), ectopic PDGF expression is sufficient to drive the initiation of disease in CDK4 positive tumor cells, but if the microenvironment is CDK4 deficient these low-grade lesions would not progress to high grade lethal malignancies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ciznadija et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mechanisms of CDK4/6 inhibitor action observed in preclinical models are relevant to their clinical effects in human cancers.

    “Here we highlight the mechanisms by which CDK4/6 inhibitors can exert their anti-tumor activities beyond simply enforcing cytostatic growth arrest and discuss how this knowledge may inform new combinations, improve outcomes and modify dosing schedules in the future.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The senescence and SASP programs induced by CDK4/6 inhibitors in model systems are representative of those in human tumors.

    “Collectively, these observations suggest that the most effective approach to harness the senescence promoting effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors may be to first induce senescence and then eliminate the persistent senescent cells.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Rb-negative tumors do not respond significantly to CDK4/6 inhibitors.

    “Given the importance of CDK4 in the tumor microenvironment, it may be somewhat surprising that CDK4/6 inhibitors have no significant effect on Rb-negative tumors.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors and other CDK inhibitors both halt malignant cell proliferation and produce multiple immunomodulatory effects.

    “Accumulating evidence suggests that CDK4/CDK6 inhibitors, as well as inhibitors of other CDKs, do not only arrest the proliferation of malignant cells, they also mediate multipronged immunomodulatory effects (Klein et al., 2018; Petroni et al., 2020)”

    From Immunomodulation by targeted anticancer agents (2021) · cites this paper as Klein et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, M. E., Kovatcheva, M., Davis, L. E., Tap, W. D., & Koff, A.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Koff, Andrew
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
9-20
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799372852
Cited by
378
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 16
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748, CA140146)
  • Sarcoma Foundation of America
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
CDK4/6 inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinases, mechanism of action, breast cancer, letrozole, combination therapy, anticancer activity, dosing regimen
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Neoplasms, Drug Design, Signal Transduction, Cellular Senescence, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Cell Cycle Checkpoints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review