Cited by 299Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Integrated Omics of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Open access
Li, Chen, Sun, Yi-Di, Yu, Guan-Yu, Cui, Jing-Ru, Lou, Zheng, Zhang, Hang, Huang, Ya, Bai, Chen-Guang +14 more·2020·Cancer Cell

Abstract

We integrate the genomics, proteomics, and phosphoproteomics of 480 clinical tissues from 146 patients in a Chinese colorectal cancer (CRC) cohort, among which 70 had metastatic CRC (mCRC). Proteomic profiling differentiates three CRC subtypes characterized by distinct clinical prognosis and molecular signatures. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiling of primary tumors alone successfully distinguishes cases with metastasis. Metastatic tissues exhibit high similarities with primary tumors at the genetic but not the proteomic level, and kinase network analysis reveals significant heterogeneity between primary colorectal tumors and their liver metastases. In vivo xenograft-based drug tests using 31 primary and metastatic tumors show personalized responses, which could also be predicted by kinase-substrate network analysis no matter whether tumors carry mutations in the drug-targeted genes. Our study provides a valuable resource for better understanding of mCRC and has potential for clinical application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.002

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, C., Sun, Y.-D., Yu, G.-Y., Cui, J.-R., Lou, Z., Zhang, H., Huang, Y., Bai, C.-G., Deng, L.-L., Liu, P., Zheng, K., Wang, Y.-H., Wang, Q.-Q., Li, Q.-R., Wu, Q.-Q., Liu, Q., Shyr, Y., Li, Y.-X., Chen, L.-N., Wu, J.-R., Zhang, W., & Zeng, R.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
  • Changhai Hospital (CN)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wu, Jia-Rui
  • Zhang, Wei
  • Zeng, Rong
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
734-747.e9
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3081768459
Cited by
297
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 2
FWCI
13.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFA0505500)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (91529303, 31771476, 91029301, 81572358, 30700397)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB38000000, XDA12010000)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
metastatic colorectal cancer, colorectal cancer subtypes, proteomic profiling, phosphoproteomics, cancer genomics, liver metastasis, metastasis prediction, tumor heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, China, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Phosphorylation, Prognosis, Protein Kinases, Colorectal Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Gene Expression Profiling, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Genomics, Proteomics, Mice, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review