Cited by 20Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

An addiction-based mobile health weight loss intervention: Protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Vidmar, Alaina P., Salvy, Sarah J., Pretlow, Robert, Mittelman, Steven D., Wee, Choo Phei, Fink, Cassandra, Steven Fox, D., Raymond, Jennifer K.·2019·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

Background The notion of obesity as an addictive process is controversial. However, studies show that between 5.9 and 30.7% of adolescents with obesity report food or eating addiction. Few weight management interventions have tested techniques based on addiction medicine principles.Methods This multi-center randomized control trial (RCT) is designed to test the effectiveness of a mobile health (mHealth) weight-loss intervention based on addiction principles, such as withdrawal and tolerance, in a sample of 180 adolescents (ages 14-18) recruited from four pediatric weight management clinics in Southern California. Akin to a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) design evaluating multicomponent behavioral interventions, we will compare the combination of an app + phone coaching (App+Coach) to app alone (App) and in-clinic multi-disciplinary (Clinic) intervention arms. The primary outcome is mean change in zBMI and %BMI p95 over 18 months. We hypothesize that youth who receive App+Coach will have a greater reduction in body weight over the 18-month study period at a lower cost than standard of care models. Secondary outcomes include adherence to treatment regimen, intervention satisfaction, effect of the intervention on metabolic factors and activity level. We will also explore potential moderators of intervention effectiveness such as addictive eating habits, self-regulation and executive functioning.Conclusions New and creative approaches are needed to address pediatric obesity. If successful, this RCT may provide an innovative and cost-effective mHealth approach, based on addiction methods, for weight loss among adolescents with overweight and obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2019.01.008

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among adolescents with obesity (n = 18), an FA-informed mobile health (app) intervention reduced zBMI in a more cost-effective manner than the in-clinic intervention.

    “Among adolescents with obesity (n = 18), an FA-informed mobile health (app) intervention reduced zBMI in a more cost-effective manner than the in-clinic intervention, and there is currently an RCT underway in a larger sample using this approach [229,230].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Vidmar, A. P., Salvy, S. J., Pretlow, R., Mittelman, S. D., Wee, C. P., Fink, C., Steven Fox, D., & Raymond, J. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Saban Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Vidmar, Alaina P.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
78
Pages
11-19
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909774182
Cited by
20
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Biostatistics Core and NIH/NCRR SC-CTSI (UL1 TR000130)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
adolescent obesity, mobile health, food addiction, mobile application, phone coaching, pediatric obesity management, body mass index, medication adherence, metabolic factors, physical activity, self-regulation, executive function, cost-effectiveness
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Food Addiction, Adolescent, Body Weight, California, Feeding Behavior, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Mentors, Patient Compliance, Research Design, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Single-Blind Method, Patient Satisfaction, Executive Function, Weight Reduction Programs, Mobile Applications, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review