Cited by 77Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and Behaviors

An addiction model-based mobile health weight loss intervention in adolescents with obesity

Open access
Vidmar, A. P., Pretlow, R., Borzutzky, C., Wee, C. P., Fox, D. S., Fink, C., Mittelman, S. D.·2019·Pediatric Obesity

Abstract

Summary Background Clinical approaches to treating childhood obesity can be expensive and poorly reimbursed, and often produce suboptimal results. It has been theorized that overeating may have addictive qualities, and a sizable number of adolescents with obesity endorse addictive habits. Interestingly, few weight management interventions have tested techniques founded in addiction medicine principles. We therefore performed a pilot study of an addiction model based mHealth weight loss intervention in adolescents. Methods Adolescents with obesity were recruited from an multidisciplinary weight management clinic (EMPOWER). Adolescents without significant obesity comorbidities, who exhibited signs of addictive eating, based on the Yale Food Addiction Scale, were enrolled in a pilot study of an interactive, addiction‐based, weight loss smartphone app with coaching ( http://clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02689154). The app was designed to help subjects omit problem foods, avoid snacking and reduce meal size. A contemporary cohort of adolescents who completed the EMPOWER program were evaluated. Feasibility of recruitment, adherence, retention rates, BMI change and cost of intervention were examined. Results Eighteen participants were recruited to app intervention. App participants had higher retention (100% vs. 37%) and lower total cost per patient ($855.15 vs. $1428.00) than the EMPOWER clinic participants. App participants exhibited a significant decrease in zBMI and %BMIp95 over the 6 months (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001), which was comparable to the age‐matched EMPOWER program completers (p = 0.31 and p = 0.06). Conclusions An addiction medicine‐based mHealth intervention targeted for adolescents was feasible to implement, resulted in high retention and adherence rates, and reduced zBMI and %BMIp95 in a more cost‐effective manner than an in‐clinic intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/ijpo.12464

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among adolescents with obesity (n = 18), an FA-informed mobile health (app) intervention reduced zBMI in a more cost-effective manner than the in-clinic intervention.

    “Among adolescents with obesity (n = 18), an FA-informed mobile health (app) intervention reduced zBMI in a more cost-effective manner than the in-clinic intervention, and there is currently an RCT underway in a larger sample using this approach [229,230].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vidmar, A. P., Pretlow, R., Borzutzky, C., Wee, C. P., Fox, D. S., Fink, C., & Mittelman, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • eHealth International, Inc. Seattle WA USA
  • Saban Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Vidmar, A. P.
Venue
Pediatric Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-16
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
e12464-e12464
ISSN
  • 2047-6302 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-6310
OpenAlex
W2885201868
Cited by
76
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3
FWCI
14.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pediatric Obesity (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • NIH/NCRR SC-CTSI (UL1 TR000130)
  • Children's Hospital of Los Angeles Biostatistics Core
  • eHealth International, Inc.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
adolescent obesity, addiction models, food addiction, mobile health intervention, mobile application, weight loss, Yale Food Addiction Scale, intervention feasibility, cost-effectiveness, BMI reduction
MeSH terms
Food Addiction, Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Adolescent, Child, Costs and Cost Analysis, Feasibility Studies, Female, Food, Humans, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Telemedicine, Weight Reduction Programs, Mobile Applications, Pediatric Obesity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review