Cited by 95Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline and Blended Learning

Effects of self-regulation scaffolding on online participation and learning outcomes

Song, Donggil, Kim, Dongho·2021·Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate whether an interactive self-regulation scaffolding increases levels of online learners’ self-regulated learning skills, course participation, and learning performance. The intervention utilizes a dialog approach with an intelligent conversational agent to scaffold learners’ self-regulated learning. Fifty-six graduate students participated in this study over a semester and were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: (1) an experimental condition where a scaffold was provided through the conversational agent and (2) a control condition where the self-regulated learning information was given, but any scaffolds were not provided. The results revealed that the scaffolded group showed higher self-regulated learning level gains than the control group. Additionally, the relationships between self-regulated learning, course participation, and learning performance were investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15391523.2020.1767525

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies have shown that the use of conversational agents could be useful to support students' self-regulated learning in online environments.

    “Recent studies have shown that the use of conversational agents could be useful to support students’ self-regulated learning in online environments (Scheu & Benke, 2022; Song & Kim, 2021).”

    From Designing learning technology collaboratively: analysis of a chatbot co-design (2023) · cites this paper as Song & Kim, 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, D., & Kim, D.
Affiliations
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Corresponding author
Song, Donggil
Venue
Journal of Research on Technology in Education
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
249-263
ISSN
  • 1539-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0818
OpenAlex
W3035263232
Cited by
95
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Research on Technology in Education (publishedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
student self-regulation, scaffolding, chatbots, intelligent tutoring systems, online learning, course participation, learning performance, graduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review