Cited by 107Writing and Handwriting EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Teacher implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students

Palermo, Corey, Thomson, Margareta Maria·2018·Contemporary Educational Psychology

DOI 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The Power of Feedback
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539809545028 · Cited by 4,880
Handbook of Writing Research
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609
Handbook of Metacognition in Education
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203876428 · Cited by 1,509
Common Core State Standards
Shanahan, C. R. (2011) · Cited by 866
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades.
Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S. A., & Harris, K. R. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029185 · Cited by 828
Handbook of Learning Disabilities
Knapp, P. (2004) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-200405000-00018 · Cited by 574
Untitled work
(2007) · Cited by 563
Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey.
Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0012656 · Cited by 521
Improving the Writing, Knowledge, and Motivation of Struggling Young Writers: Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development With and Without Peer Support
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2006) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312043002295 · Cited by 509
Common Core State Standards
Shanahan, T. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681130 · Cited by 469
Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey.
Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. S. (2009) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013097 · Cited by 399
Powerful Writing Strategies for All Students
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2007) · Cited by 390
Untitled work
(2003) · Cited by 389
Teaching Writing to Elementary Students in Grades 4–6: A National Survey
Gilbert, J. K., & Graham, S. (2010) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/651193 · Cited by 386
What writers know : the language, process, and structure of written discourse
Nystrand, M. (1982) · Academic Press eBooks · Cited by 376
A Perspective on Strategy Research: Progress and Prospects
Alexander, P. A., Graham, S. W., & Harris, K. R. (1998) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1023/a:1022185502996 · Cited by 351
Formative Assessment and Writing: A Meta-Analysis
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681947 · Cited by 340
Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms.
Paz, S. D. L., & Graham, S. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687 · Cited by 311
Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004 · Cited by 297
Effects of Historical Reasoning Instruction and Writing Strategy Mastery in Culturally and Academically Diverse Middle School Classrooms.
Paz, S. D. L. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.139 · Cited by 291
On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of the writing construct
Deane, P. (2012) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.002 · Cited by 288
The effects of computer-generated feedback on the quality of writing
Stevenson, M., & Phakiti, A. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.007 · Cited by 275
Strategy Instruction and the Teaching of Writing: A Meta-Analysis.
Graham, S. (2006) · Cited by 273
Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: the influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards
Labuhn, A. S., Zimmerman, B. J., & Hasselhorn, M. (2010) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9056-2 · Cited by 268
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213600 · Cited by 262
Utility in a Fallible Tool: A Multi-Site Case Study of Automated Writing Evaluation.
Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010) · The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment (Boston College) · Cited by 241
Self-Efficacy and Writing: A Different View of Self-Evaluation
McCarthy, P. R., Meier, S. T., & Rinderer, R. (1985) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357865 · Cited by 230
State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration
Shermis, M. D. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 · Cited by 227
Word processing programs and weaker writers/readers: a meta-analysis of research findings
Morphy, P., & Graham, S. (2011) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9292-5 · Cited by 214
Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing.
Berninger, V. W., Vaughan, K. B., Abbott, R. D., Begay, K. K., Coleman, K. B., Curtin, G., Hawkins, J. M., & Graham, S. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.291 · Cited by 213
Teaching writing to middle school students: a national survey
Graham, S., Capizzi, A. M., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M. A., & Morphy, P. (2013) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9495-7 · Cited by 211
Self-Regulated Strategy Development in the Classroom: Part of a Balanced Approach to Writing Instruction for Students With Disabilities
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2017) · Focus on Exceptional Children · doi:10.17161/foec.v35i7.6799 · Cited by 208
Primary grade teachers' instructional adaptations for struggling writers: A national survey.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Chorzempa, B. F., & MacArthur, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.279 · Cited by 156
Writing pal: Feasibility of an intelligent writing strategy tutor in the high school classroom.
Roscoe, R. D., & McNamara, D. S. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0032340 · Cited by 144
Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Helping Students with Learning Problems Develop as Writers
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1993) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/461758 · Cited by 140
Practice-based professional development and Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in second grade
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003 · Cited by 130
Self-Regulated Strategy Development in Writing
Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2016) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732215624216 · Cited by 124
Writing Assessment: A Position Statement
CCCC Committee on Assessment (1995) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358714 · Cited by 103
Common Core State Standards, Writing, and Students with LD: Recommendations
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2013) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/ldrp.12004 · Cited by 101
Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student perceptions of automated writing evaluation
Roscoe, R. D., Wilson, J., Johnson, A. C., & Mayra, C. R. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.076 · Cited by 98
Does Automated Feedback Help Students Learn to Write?
Kellogg, R. T., Whiteford, A. P., & Quinlan, T. (2010) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.42.2.c · Cited by 88
Handbook of Research on Technology Tools for Real-World Skill Development
Rosen, Y., Ferrara, S., & Mosharraf, M. (2015) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5 · Cited by 88
Illuminating growth and struggles using mixed methods: Practice-based professional development and coaching for differentiating SRSD instruction in writing
McKeown, D., Brindle, M., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Brown, M. C. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9627-y · Cited by 87
Professional development in Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Effects on the writing performance of eighth grade Portuguese students
Festas, I., de Oliveira, A. L., Rebelo, J. A., Damião, M. H., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2014) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.05.004 · Cited by 83
Classwide Teacher Implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Writing with Students with E/BD in a Residential Facility
Ennis, R. P., Jolivette, K., Terry, N. P., Fredrick, L. D., & Alberto, P. A. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9207-7 · Cited by 72
Self-Regulated Strategy Development in the Classroom: Part of a Balanced Approach to Writing Instruction for Students With Disabilities
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2017) · Focus on Exceptional Children · doi:10.17161/fec.v35i7.6799 · Cited by 71
Trait Ratings for Automated Essay Grading
Shermis, M. D., Koch, C. M., Page, E. B., Keith, T. Z., & Harrington, S. (2002) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164402062001001 · Cited by 67
Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays
Shermis, M. D., & Hamner, B. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203122761.ch19 · Cited by 63
Self-regulated strategy development in writing: Going beyond NLEs to a more balanced approach
Harris, K. R., Santangelo, T., & Graham, S. (2008) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9062-9 · Cited by 61
Tier 1, Teacher-Implemented Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Students With and Without Behavioral Challenges
Harris, K. R., Lane, K. L., Driscoll, S. A., Graham, S., Wilson, K. D., Sandmel, K. N., Brindle, M., & Schatschneider, C. W. (2012) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/667403 · Cited by 56
Comparing the accuracy of different scoring methods for identifying sixth graders at risk of failing a state writing assessment
Wilson, J., Olinghouse, N. G., McCoach, D. B., Santangelo, T., & Andrada, G. N. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.06.003 · Cited by 52
The Nature of Automated Essay Scoring Feedback
Dikli, S. (2011) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.11139/cj.28.1.99-134 · Cited by 52
Managing What We Can Measure: Quantifying the Susceptibility of Automated Scoring Systems to Gaming Behavior
Higgins, D., & Heilman, M. (2014) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/emip.12036 · Cited by 51
Story Writing
Lane, K. L., Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Little, M. A., Sandmel, K. N., & Brindle, M. (2009) · The Journal of Special Education · doi:10.1177/0022466908331044 · Cited by 50
Self-Regulated Strategy Development: Effects on Writers with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Asaro‐Saddler, K. (2014) · Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1177/215416471404900107 · Cited by 46
The Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development on the Writing of Expository Essays for Adults With Written Expression Difficulties
Berry, A. B., & Mason, L. H. (2010) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932510375469 · Cited by 44
Associated effects of automated essay evaluation software on growth in writing quality for students with and without disabilities
Wilson, J. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9695-z · Cited by 41
The Role of Production Factors in Writing Ability
Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Goelman, H. (1981) · BRILL eBooks · doi:10.1163/9789004454118_013 · Cited by 41
The comparative efficacy of two approaches to teaching sixth graders opinion essay writing
Wong, B. Y. L., Hoskyn, M., Jai, D., Ellis, P., & Watson, K. (2008) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.12.004 · Cited by 39
Does Automated Feedback Improve Writing Quality
Wilson, J., Olinghouse, N. G., & Andrada, G. N. (2014) · Learning disabilities · Cited by 35
Universal screening with automated essay scoring: Evaluating classification accuracy in grades 3 and 4
Wilson, J. (2018) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.12.005 · Cited by 34
Dealing With Dependence (Part II): A Gentle Introduction to Hierarchical Linear Modeling
McCoach, D. B. (2010) · Gifted Child Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0016986210373475 · Cited by 33
Prediction probability as a determiner of anticipatory and preparatory electrodermal behavior.
Grings, W. W., & Sukoneck, H. I. (1971) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0031866 · Cited by 32
Using Automated Feedback to Improve Writing Quality
Wilson, J., & Andrada, G. N. (2015) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5.ch026 · Cited by 31
On the vulnerability of automated scoring to construct-irrelevant response strategies (CIRS): An illustration
Bejar, I. I., Flor, M., Futagi, Y., & Ramineni, C. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2014.06.001 · Cited by 28
The Impact of Automated Essay Scoring on Writing Outcomes
Shermis, M. D., GARVAN, C. W., & Diao, Y. (2008) · Cited by 23
Improving the Writing Performance of High School Students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Writing Difficulties
Jacobson, L. T., & Reid, R. R. (2012) · Exceptionality · doi:10.1080/09362835.2012.724624 · Cited by 20
Automated Scoring in Assessment Systems
Bunch, M. B., Vaughn, D., & Miel, S. (2015) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5.ch023 · Cited by 17
Self-regulated strategies development in writing: Development, implementation and scaling up
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Santangelo, T. (2013) · Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) · Cited by 9
Untitled work
(1997) · Cited by 7

Sorted by citations

Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence
Swiecki, Z., Khosravi, H., Chen, G., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Lodge, J. M., Milligan, S., Selwyn, N., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100075 · Cited by 409
Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199 · Cited by 311
A systematic review of AI-based automated written feedback research
Shi, H., & Aryadoust, V. (2024) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344023000265 · Cited by 222
Automated Writing Evaluation and Feedback: Multiple Metrics of Efficacy
Wilson, J., & Roscoe, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633119830764 · Cited by 176
Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students' performance
Fleckenstein, J., Liebenow, L. W., & Meyer, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1162454 · Cited by 145

See all 107

Authors: Palermo, C., & Thomson, M. M.
Affiliations: North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author: Palermo, Corey
ORCID: Palermo, Corey
Thomson, Margareta Maria
Venue: Contemporary Educational Psychology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2018-07
Volume: 54
Pages: 255-270
ISSN: 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.002
OpenAlex: W2856745662
Cited by: 107
References: 74
Citations by year: 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5
FWCI: 20.37
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Locations: Contemporary Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords: self-regulated strategy development, automated writing evaluation, argumentative writing, writing instruction, junior high school students, writing quality, teacher implementation, low-intensity intervention, social validity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Teacher implementation of Self-Regulated Strategy Development with an automated writing evaluation system: Effects on the argumentative writing performance of middle school students

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks