The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“research indicates that students' perceptions of the value of completing certain English as a Second Language (ESL) writing tasks are strongly linked to their motivation to engage with these tasks (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020).”
From Generative AI and Essay Writing: Impacts of Automated Feedback on Revision Performance and Engagement (2024) · cites this paper as Eccles & Wigfield, 2020
In the citing paper
“Most recent discussions of motivation-achievement interactions emphasize the need for alternative methods to self-report questionnaires.These alternatives include experience sampling, daily diaries, think-aloud protocols, observations, and structured interviews (Eccles & Wigfield, 2020).”
From Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2022) · cites this paper as Eccles & Wigfield, 2020
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Mindset: The New Psychology of Success
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2397 · Cited by 7,804
Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015 · Cited by 7,383
Self-citationRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 · Cited by 6,037
The four-phase model of interest development
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4 · Cited by 4,702
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Eccles, 1989, Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents, Vol. 3, 139
- Wigfield, A., & Gladstone, J. (2019). How students’ expectancies and values relate to their achievement in times of global change and uncertainty. In E. N. Gonida & M. Lemos (Eds.), Motivation in education at a time of global change: Theory, research, and implications for practice (Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 20). London: Emerald.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bernacki, M. L., Greene, M. J., & Lobczowski, N. G. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09615-8 · Cited by 618
Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework
Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9 · Cited by 623
Control-Value Theory: From Achievement Emotion to a General Theory of Human Emotions
Pekrun, R. H. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09909-7 · Cited by 595
Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09864-3 · Cited by 579
Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100199 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eccles, Jacquelynne S.
- Venue
- Contemporary Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 101859
- ISSN
- 0361-476X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3031051743
- Cited by
- 2,368
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 535 · 2025: 549 · 2024: 438 · 2023: 423 · 2022: 241 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 29
- FWCI
- 204.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Contemporary Educational Psychology (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-17553, HD-17296)
- National Institute for Mental Health (MH-31724)
- National Science Foundation (BNS-8510504)
- Spencer Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Keywords
- expectancy-value theory, situated expectancy-value theory, achievement motivation, task value, subjective task value, developmental perspective, social cognitive perspective, sociocultural perspective, performance feedback, student engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review