Cited by 411Congenital heart defects researchCardiac Fibrosis and RemodelingCardiovascular Effects of Exercise

C/EBPβ Controls Exercise-Induced Cardiac Growth and Protects against Pathological Cardiac Remodeling

Open access
Boström, Pontus, Mann, Nina, Wu, Jun, Quintero, Pablo A., Plovie, Eva R., Panáková, Daniela, Gupta, Rana K., Xiao, Chunyang +3 more·2010·Cell

Abstract

The heart has the ability to grow in size in response to exercise, but little is known about the transcriptional mechanisms underlying physiological hypertrophy. Adult cardiomyocytes have also recently been proven to hold the potential for proliferation, a process that could be of great importance for regenerative medicine. Using a unique RT-PCR-based screen against all transcriptional components, we showed that C/EBPβ was downregulated with exercise, whereas the expression of CITED4 was increased. Reduction of C/EBPβ in vitro and in vivo resulted in a phenocopy of endurance exercise with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and proliferation. This proliferation was mediated, at least in part, by the increased CITED4. Importantly, mice with reduced cardiac C/EBPβ levels displayed substantial resistance to cardiac failure upon pressure overload. These data indicate that C/EBPβ represses cardiomyocyte growth and proliferation in the adult mammalian heart and that reduction in C/EBPβ is a central signal in physiologic hypertrophy and proliferation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.036

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another response of the heart to endurance exercise is limited proliferation of cardiomyocytes and cardiac stem cells in rodents.

    “Another response of the heart to endurance exercise is the limited proliferation of cardiomyocytes and cardiac stem cells in rodents (16, 80, 146).”

    From The Hippo signal transduction network for exercise physiologists (2016) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results section (“Cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte proliferation are induced following endurance exercise”; page unavailable) reports a small but significant increase in proliferation markers in cardiomyocytes of exercised mice and evidence of completed cell division. The passages do not establish that cardiac stem cells also proliferated in response to exercise, so that part of the claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Swim endurance training for 2 weeks increased expression of proliferation markers in mouse cardiomyocytes.

    “Moreover, swim endurance training for 2 weeks increased the expression of proliferation markers in mouse cardiomyocytes (16),”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boström, P., Mann, N., Wu, J., Quintero, P. A., Plovie, E. R., Panáková, D., Gupta, R. K., Xiao, C., MacRae, C. A., Rosenzweig, A., & Spiegelman, B. M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rosenzweig, Anthony
  • Spiegelman, Bruce M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-12
Volume
143
Issue
7
Pages
1072-1083
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159745709
Cited by
411
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Heart Association
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation
  • Hjärt-Lungfonden
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL085593, R01HL109264, K08HL076361)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK054477)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Keywords
C/EBPβ, exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy, cardiomyocyte proliferation, cardiac regeneration, heart failure, pressure overload, cardiac remodeling, transcriptional repression, endurance exercise, cardiomyocyte growth
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Gene Expression Regulation, Heart, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Myocardium, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Transcription Factors, Zebrafish, CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Protein-beta, Myocytes, Cardiac, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review