Cited by 1,300Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 5 of the 28 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

A Whole-Cell Computational Model Predicts Phenotype from Genotype

Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Understanding how complex phenotypes arise from individual molecules and their interactions is a primary challenge in biology that computational approaches are poised to tackle. We report a whole-cell computational model of the life cycle of the human pathogen Mycoplasma genitalium that includes all of its molecular components and their interactions. An integrative approach to modeling that combines diverse mathematics enabled the simultaneous inclusion of fundamentally different cellular processes and experimental measurements. Our whole-cell model accounts for all annotated gene functions and was validated against a broad range of data. The model provides insights into many previously unobserved cellular behaviors, including in vivo rates of protein-DNA association and an inverse relationship between the durations of DNA replication initiation and replication rates. In addition, experimental analysis directed by model predictions identified previously undetected kinetic parameters and biological functions. We conclude that comprehensive whole-cell models can be used to facilitate biological discovery.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

5 of 28 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 62 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 26
  • Borderline: one of the tests for a substantial claim is unclear. 1
30 of 30
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Biological systems are modular, so cells can be modeled by dividing them into functional processes, modeling each process independently on a short time scale, and integrating the sub-models at longer time scales.

    “Because biological systems are modular, cells can be modeled by (1) dividing cells into functional processes, (2) independently modeling each process on a short time scale, and (3) integrating process sub-models at longer time scales.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The cellular process sub-models are approximately independent of one another on short time scales of less than one second.

    “We began with the assumption that the sub-models are approximately independent on short time scales (less than one second in this work).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data and parameters obtained from other organisms are applicable enough to M. genitalium to build and validate the model.

    “As a result, much of the data used to build and validate the model was obtained from other organisms.”
3 of 3

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Shorter doubling time conflicts with the reported growth impairment

    Minor

    A doubling time 40% lower than wild type indicates faster growth, whereas the authors interpret the result as a severe impairment of growth. The direction of the reported change conflicts with that conclusion.

  • Tdk adjustment is attributed to different disruption strains

    Minor

    The stated hypothesis concerns the tdk disruption strain, but the next sentence says the adjustment confirmed it by reducing growth of the thyA strain. The strain named in the predicted outcome does not match the one in the reported outcome.

  • Sub-model time scale is both below and equal to one second

    Minor

    The results describe the short time scale used in this work as less than one second, while the methods say each process was modeled independently on a one-second time scale.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 47 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,291

Metadata

Authors
Karr, J. R., Sanghvi, J. C., Macklin, D. N., Gutschow, M. V., Jacobs, J. M., Bolival, B., Assad-Garcia, N., Glass, J. I., & Covert, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Covert, Markus W.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
150
Issue
2
Pages
389-401
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081781433
Cited by
1,300
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 84 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 137 · 2014: 119 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 41
FWCI
54.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (DP1OD006413)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (DP1LM011510)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
Mycoplasma genitalium, genotype-phenotype correlation, life cycle modeling, DNA replication initiation, gene expression regulation, kinetic parameter estimation
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Cell Cycle, Computer Simulation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Models, Biological, Phenotype, Mycoplasma genitalium, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review