Insulated Neighborhoods: Structural and Functional Units of Mammalian Gene Control
Open accessAbstract
Understanding how transcriptional enhancers control over 20,000 protein-coding genes to maintain cell-type-specific gene expression programs in all human cells is a fundamental challenge in regulatory biology. Recent studies suggest that gene regulatory elements and their target genes generally occur within insulated neighborhoods, which are chromosomal loop structures formed by the interaction of two DNA sites bound by the CTCF protein and occupied by the cohesin complex. Here, we review evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease. Insulated neighborhoods are a powerful paradigm for gene control that provides new insights into development and disease.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that insulated neighborhoods—CTCF-CTCF loops co-bound by cohesin that contain at least one gene—are structural and functional units of mammalian gene control. It synthesizes evidence that these loops constrain enhancer-gene interactions, are largely preserved across cell types, and are disrupted in disease.
Key findings
- In human ESCs, there are ~13,000 insulated neighborhoods, ranging from 25 kb to 940 kb and containing 1–10 genes; the median neighborhood is ~190 kb and contains 3 genes.
- Most enhancer/promoter DNA loops occur within insulated neighborhood boundaries: ~97% in human ESCs and ~90% in T cell leukemia cells; 59% of human ESC neighborhoods have an insulation score of 100%.
- Insulated neighborhoods are proposed as the mechanistic basis of TADs: at least 50% of TADs have TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loops, and 70% of loop domains and 54% of CTCF contact domains share boundaries with an insulated neighborhood in human lymphoblastoid cells.
- Neighborhood boundaries are largely shared across cell types (~80% shared by any two cell types), while enhancer-gene interactions within them are cell-type specific; CTCF sites at neighborhood boundaries are evolutionarily conserved, and ~55% of CTCF binding sites do not appear to participate in neighborhood loops.
Methods
- Narrative review synthesizing published studies on chromosome conformation, CTCF/cohesin binding, enhancer-promoter interactions, and disease-associated non-coding variation.
- Evidence discussed includes Hi-C, ChIA-PET, 5C, CRISPR/Cas9 perturbation, DNA methylation editing, and cancer genomics studies; no new experimental data are reported.
- Main analysis is conceptual synthesis, proposing insulated neighborhoods as a unifying model for enhancer-gene specificity, TAD structure, and gene dysregulation in disease.
Limitations
- The paper states that loop dynamics and cell-to-cell heterogeneity are not understood; current assays generally study cell populations and are inadequate for single-cell dynamics.
- The paper states that DNA interaction data are noisy and sparse, making it difficult to estimate how extensively neighborhoods are shared across cell types; mechanisms regulating loop anchors, how a loop insulates, and whether anchors vary in insulation strength remain unclear.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it presents no primary data and does not describe a systematic search or meta-analysis, so its conclusions depend on the cited studies and their experimental/analytical assumptions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 155 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given
In neighborhoods with two genes, the activity of the two is coherent in 60% (both are active or both are silent).
“We estimate that in neighborhoods with two genes, the activity of the two is coherent in 60% (both are active or both are silent).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Each chromosome contains thousands of DNA loops, formed by the interaction of two CTCF molecules bound to different sites, and reinforced by a cohesin molecule.
“In the models that emerge from these data, each chromosome contains thousands of DNA loops, formed by the interaction of two CTCF molecules bound to different sites, and reinforced by a cohesin molecule (Figure 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
TADs have similar boundaries in all human cell types examined.
“These TADs, which have similar boundaries in all human cell types examined, have been proposed to constrain enhancer-gene interactions because most DNA contacts occur within the TADs (Dixon et al., 2015; Dixon et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Insulators are regulatory elements that can block the ability of an enhancer to activate a gene when located between them.
“Another potential solution to the enhancer-gene specificity conundrum lies in insulators, which are regulatory elements that can block the ability of an enhancer to activate a gene when located between them (Chung et al., 1993; Geyer and Corces, 1992; Kellum and Schedl, 1991; Udvardy et al., 1985).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chung et al., 1993 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Geyer and Corces, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kellum and Schedl, 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gene regulatory elements and their target genes generally occur within insulated neighborhoods, which are chromosomal loop structures formed by the interaction of two DNA sites bound by CTCF and occupied by the cohesin complex.
“Recent studies suggest that gene regulatory elements and their target genes generally occur within insulated neighborhoods, which are chromosomal loop structures formed by the interaction of two DNA sites bound by the CTCF protein and occupied by the cohesin complex.”
- Also stated in: § Preamble · plain
“A core principle that has emerged from these studies is that genes and their regulatory elements typically occur together within specific DNA loop structures, which we have called “insulated neighborhoods”.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Preamble · plain
- Premisecitation
Insulators are bound by the transcription factor CTCF.
“Insulators are bound by the transcription factor CTCF (Bell et al., 1999), but only a minority of CTCF sites function as insulators (Liu et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bell et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Individual interphase chromosomes tend to occupy small portions of the nucleus, called chromosome territories, rather than spreading throughout this organelle.
“In situ hybridization techniques and microscopy have revealed that individual interphase chromosomes tend to occupy small portions of the nucleus, called “chromosome territories”, rather than spreading throughout this organelle (Cremer and Cremer, 2010); interactions between chromosomes would be minimized in this manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cremer and Cremer, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The subset of CTCF sites that form loop anchors function to insulate enhancers and genes within the loop from enhancers and genes outside the loop.
“As described below, the subset of CTCF sites that form these “loop anchors” thus function to insulate enhancers and genes within the loop from enhancers and genes outside the loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Insulated neighborhoods are essential for both normal gene activation and repression.
“We review here evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions.
“We review here evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Enhancer-bound proteins tend to interact only with genes within CTCF-CTCF loops.
“Enhancer-bound proteins are constrained such that they tend to interact only with genes within these CTCF-CTCF loops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
Insulated neighborhoods are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease.
“We review here evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Only a minority of CTCF sites function as insulators.
“Insulators are bound by the transcription factor CTCF (Bell et al., 1999), but only a minority of CTCF sites function as insulators (Liu et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Insulated neighborhoods form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development.
“We review here evidence that insulated neighborhoods provide for specific enhancer-gene interactions, are essential for both normal gene activation and repression, form a chromosome scaffold that is largely preserved throughout development, and are perturbed by genetic and epigenetic factors in disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
TADs constrain enhancer-gene interactions because most DNA contacts occur within the TADs.
“These TADs, which have similar boundaries in all human cell types examined, have been proposed to constrain enhancer-gene interactions because most DNA contacts occur within the TADs (Dixon et al., 2015; Dixon et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Individual chromosomes are partitioned into megabase-sized topologically associating domains (TADs), regions with relatively high intradomain DNA interaction frequencies as measured by Hi-C chromosome conformation capture data.
“Furthermore, individual chromosomes are partitioned into megabase- sized topologically associating domains (TADs), regions with relatively high intradomain DNA interaction frequencies as measured by Hi-C chromosome conformation capture data (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhood boundaries constrain the activity of enhancers to genes within the neighborhood.
“Thus, insulated neighborhood boundaries constrain the activity of enhancers to genes within the neighborhood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
CTCF is expressed in all cell types examined.
“This constitutive behavior is consistent with the observation that CTCF is expressed in all cell types examined (Phillips and Corces, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phillips and Corces, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The CTCF sites that form insulated neighborhood boundaries are evolutionarily conserved.
“The CTCF sites that form insulated neighborhood boundaries are evolutionarily conserved.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
TADs identified by processing Hi-C data with the Hidden Markov algorithm can also be identified when this algorithm is used to process cohesin ChIA-PET data.
“Nonetheless, the TADs identified by processing Hi-C data with the Hidden Markov algorithm (Dixon et al., 2012; Nora et al., 2012) can also be identified when this algorithm is used to process cohesin ChIA-PET data (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
~55% of CTCF binding sites in the human genome do not appear to participate in insulated neighborhood loops.
“(~55% of CTCF binding sites in the human genome do not appear to participate in insulated neighborhood loops) (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
A subset of CTCF-CTCF loops have evolved to control DNA recombination.
“Thus a subset of CTCF-CTCF loops have evolved to control DNA recombination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A subset of CTCF-CTCF loops (~19% in hESCs) occur at enhancer-promoter interaction sites.
“Although most CTCF-CTCF loops form insulated neighborhoods (Figure 2C), a subset of CTCF-CTCF loops (~19% in hESCs) occur at enhancer-promoter interaction sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The vast majority of enhancer-gene interactions occur within insulated neighborhoods.
“The vast majority of enhancer-gene interactions occur within insulated neighborhoods (Dowen et al., 2014; Hnisz et al., 2016; Ji et al., 2016; Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In human ES cells, 59% of insulated neighborhoods have an insulation score of 100%.
“In human ES cells, 59% of insulated neighborhoods have an insulation score of 100%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
TADs are generally composed of, and likely structured by, insulated neighborhoods.
“Two observations argue that TADs are generally composed of, and likely structured by, insulated neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Murine and human ESC ChIA-PET data, processed with the same Hidden Markov Model, captures most TAD boundaries derived from Hi-C data in murine and human ESCs.
“Murine and human ESC ChIA-PET data, processed with the same Hidden Markov Model, captures most TAD boundaries derived from Hi-C data in murine and human ESCs (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The DNA sequence in anchor regions of insulated neighborhoods is far more conserved in primates than in regions bound by CTCF that do not participate in neighborhood loops.
“Analysis of CTCF-binding sites across primates indicates that the DNA sequence in anchor regions of insulated neighborhoods is far more conserved in primates than in regions bound by CTCF that do not participate in neighborhood loops (~55% of CTCF binding sites in the human genome do not appear to participate in insulated neighborhood loops) (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The CTCF DNA-binding motif in loop anchor regions is among the most altered human transcription factor-binding sequence in cancer cells.
“Indeed, the CTCF DNA-binding motif in loop anchor regions is among the most altered human transcription factor-binding sequence in cancer cells (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most CTCF-CTCF loops form insulated neighborhoods.
“Although most CTCF-CTCF loops form insulated neighborhoods (Figure 2C), a subset of CTCF-CTCF loops (~19% in hESCs) occur at enhancer-promoter interaction sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In human ESCs, ~97% of all enhancer or promoter-related DNA loops occur within insulated neighborhood boundaries.
“For example, in human ESCs, ~97% of all enhancer or promoter-related DNA loops occur within insulated neighborhood boundaries (Figure 2C) (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Mutations that alter the loop anchor sites of oncogene-containing insulated neighborhoods make an important contribution to the misregulation of gene expression that is inherent to the cancer state.
“These observations are consistent with the idea that mutations that alter the loop anchor sites of oncogene-containing insulated neighborhoods make an important contribution to the misregulation of gene expression that is inherent to the cancer state (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016; Katainen et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
CTCF-CTCF loops at enhancer-promoter interaction sites facilitate gene activation.
“We infer that these interactions facilitate gene activation; previous studies have noted that some genes interact with their enhancers by this mechanism (Ong and Corces, 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ong and Corces, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CTCF- and cohesin-associated loops play essential roles in V(D)J recombination of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain in developing lymphocytes.
“CTCF- and cohesin-associated loops also play essential roles in V(D)J recombination of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain in developing lymphocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dong et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hu et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In T cell leukemia cells, ~90% of all enhancer or promoter-related DNA loops occur within insulated neighborhood boundaries.
“Similarly, in T cell leukemia cells, ~90% of all enhancer or promoter-related DNA loops occur within insulated neighborhood boundaries (Hnisz et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hnisz et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhoods are a major structuring component of TADs.
“These results suggest that insulated neighborhoods are a major structuring component of TADs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The majority of insulated neighborhoods mapped in human ES cells appear to be maintained during development because CTCF binding and CTCF-CTCF loop structures are very similar in many other human cells.
“The majority of insulated neighborhoods that have been mapped in human ES cells appear to be maintained during development because the experimental evidence indicates that CTCF binding and CTCF-CTCF loop structures are very similar in many other human cells (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many TADs are composed of smaller TAD-like domains at higher resolution.
“TADs were originally discovered using Hi-C data that had ~40kb resolution, and improvements of the experimental and analytical aspects of Hi-C methods revealed that many TADs are composed of smaller TAD-like domains at higher resolution (Schmitt et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schmitt et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of CTCF binding sites at the anchors of insulated neighborhoods produces changes in the expression of genes within the neighborhoods and immediately adjacent to the deleted neighborhood boundary.
“In a dozen loci and in multiple cell types, CRISPR/Cas9 deletion of CTCF binding sites at the anchors of insulated neighborhoods have been shown to produce changes in the expression of genes within the neighborhoods and immediately adjacent to the deleted neighborhood boundary.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
When genes occur within multiple nested insulated neighborhoods, deletion of multiple boundary sites is required to observe changes in gene expression.
“Furthermore, when genes occur within multiple nested insulated neighborhoods, deletion of multiple boundary sites were required to observe changes in gene expression (Dowen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Somatic mutations occur frequently and recurrently in the loop anchors of oncogene-containing insulated neighborhoods in a variety of cancer cells.
“Somatic mutations occur frequently and recurrently in the loop anchors of oncogene-containing Insulated neighborhoods in a variety of cancer cells (Figure 2E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationcitation
Somatic mutations in CTCF and cohesin coding sequences likely contribute to oncogenesis by altering insulated neighborhoods.
“Cancer genome sequencing has revealed that somatic mutations occur in CTCF and cohesin coding sequences in various solid tumors and leukemias (Lawrence et al., 2014), and it seems likely that these mutations contribute to oncogenesis by altering insulated neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lawrence et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Allelic non-coding variants in CTCF loop anchors correlate with allele-specific enhancer-promoter interactions.
“However, allelic non-coding variants in CTCF loop anchors have been shown to correlate with allele-specific enhancer-promoter interactions (Tang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Inversion of a CTCF anchor has been shown to cause altered enhancer-promoter contacts at the protocadherin locus.
“Inversion of a CTCF anchor has also been shown to cause altered enhancer-promoter contacts at the protocadherin locus (Guo et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Guo et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The CTCF-CTCF loops that encompass insulated neighborhoods, together with the enhancer-promoter loops within them, likely form the mechanistic basis of most interphase chromosome structures.
“It is thus possible that all high-resolution TADs are insulated neighborhoods and vice-versa, and so the CTCF-CTCF loops that encompass insulated neighborhoods, together with the enhancer-promoter loops within them, likely form the mechanistic basis of most interphase chromosome structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Tissue-specific CTCF-CTCF loops participate in developmental gene control.
“In fetal brain cells, CTCF binding to one of the beta-globin loop anchor regions is absent and CTCF-CTCF loop formation is not detected (Splinter et al., 2006; Tolhuis et al., 2002), which suggests that tissue-specific CTCF-CTCF loops participate in developmental gene control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The convergent orientation of CTCF motifs in the anchors is a general feature of insulated neighborhoods.
“The convergent orientation of CTCF motifs in the anchors is also a general feature of insulated neighborhoods (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The vast majority of RNA Polymerase II-associated interactions occur within the boundaries of CTCF-contact domains.
“The vast majority of RNA Polymerase II-associated interactions (e.g. enhancer-promoter loops) were found to occur within the boundaries of CTCF-contact domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cancer genome sequencing has revealed that somatic mutations occur in CTCF and cohesin coding sequences in various solid tumors and leukemias.
“Cancer genome sequencing has revealed that somatic mutations occur in CTCF and cohesin coding sequences in various solid tumors and leukemias (Lawrence et al., 2014), and it seems likely that these mutations contribute to oncogenesis by altering insulated neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lawrence et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Gene activation by NOTCH signaling in T-cells is restricted to genes that occur within the same CTCF-CTCF loops as NOTCH-dependent enhancers.
“The effect of insulated neighborhoods on signal-responsive gene expression also supports the concept of insulation; gene activation by NOTCH signaling in T-cells was found to be restricted to genes that occur within the same CTCF-CTCF loops as NOTCH-dependent enhancers (Wang et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
An insulated neighborhood on the maternal allele allows an enhancer-promoter interaction that activates the H19 gene but not the IGF2 gene, which is excluded from the neighborhood.
“An insulated neighborhood on the maternal allele allows an enhancer-promoter interaction that activates the H19 gene but not the IGF2 gene, which is excluded from the neighborhood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
~2,000 CTCF-contact domains (CCDs) were mapped in human cells.
“A recent study mapped CTCF-associated contacts genome-wide using CTCF ChIA-PET and revealed ~2,000 “CTCF-contact domains (CCDs)” in human cells (Tang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
Sub-TADs, loop domains, and CTCF-contact domains generally represent the same structural unit as insulated neighborhoods.
“An analysis of the structures described in these studies suggests that they generally represent the same structural unit as the insulated neighborhoods described here (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Parent-of-origin specific gene activity at the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus is controlled by allele-specific CTCF-CTCF interactions that constrain enhancer-gene contacts in a DNA methylation-dependent manner.
“Parent-of-origin specific gene activity at the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus is controlled by allele-specific CTCF-CTCF interactions that constrain enhancer-gene contacts in a DNA methylation-dependent manner (Figure 6A) (Kurukuti et al., 2006; Murrell et al., 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A larger insulated neighborhood is formed on the paternal allele to allow an enhancer-promoter interaction that activates the IGF2 gene.
“A larger insulated neighborhood is formed on the paternal allele to allow an enhancer-promoter interaction that activates the IGF2 gene.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations or deletions which activate oncogenes also disrupt insulated neighborhoods around those genes without altering the sequence of the gene itself.
“Furthermore, chromosomal rearrangements such as translocations or deletions which activate oncogenes also disrupt insulated neighborhoods around those genes without altering the sequence of the gene itself (Groschel et al., 2014; Hnisz et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In erythroid cells expressing globin genes, a large CTCF-CTCF loop encompasses the beta-globin genes and the locus control region (LCR), consistent with the organization of the locus in an insulated neighborhood.
“In erythroid cells expressing globin genes, a large CTCF-CTCF loop encompasses the beta-globin genes and the locus control region (LCR), consistent with the organization of the locus in an insulated neighborhood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Several genetic variants linked with an individual's lipid profile and present within at least 1% of the population were found within CTCF binding sites.
“A recent human population genetics study showed several genetic variants linked with an individual's lipid profile (e.g., LDL, HDL) and present within at least 1% of the population were found within CTCF binding sites (UK10K Consortium et al., 2015), and it is possible that these variants disrupt CTCF binding at insulated neighborhood boundaries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites UK10K Consortium et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
One variant associated with asthma disrupts CTCF binding and CTCF loop formation.
“Among these, one variant, associated with asthma, disrupts CTCF binding and CTCF loop formation (Tang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Genetic variants occur rarely in insulated neighborhood anchors.
“Genetic variants occur rarely in insulated neighborhood anchors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The insulating properties of some neighborhoods may be under developmental control.
“indicating that the insulating properties of some neighborhoods may be under developmental control”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most TAD boundaries are shared by any two cell types.
“Studies on TADs have estimated that most TAD boundaries are shared by any two cell types (Dixon et al., 2015; Dixon et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Genes in two-gene neighborhoods may often be co-regulated.
“The tendency for these two-gene neighborhoods to have coherent on or off activities suggests that genes in these neighborhoods may often be co-regulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
An enhancer can target all genes within an insulated chromatin structure in Drosophila.
“recent evidence in Drosophila suggests that an enhancer can target all genes within an insulated chromatin structure (Fukaya et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fukaya et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Targeted methylation of a neighborhood anchor site with a dCas9-DNA-methyltransferase-3 fusion protein has been shown to disrupt the neighborhood.
“Indeed, targeted methylation of a neighborhood anchor site with a dCas9-DNA-metyltransferase-3 fusion protein has been shown to disrupt the neighborhood (Figure 8A) (Liu et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Liu et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Approximately 80% of insulated neighborhood boundaries are shared by any two cell types.
“Studies on insulated neighborhoods have estimated that approximately 80% of neighborhood boundaries of shared by any two cell types (Hnisz et al., 2016; Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hnisz et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
DNA methylation plays a key role in CTCF-CTCF loop anchor control and gene control.
“DNA methylation plays a key role in CTCF-CTCF loop anchor control and gene control, as illustrated in the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus (Figure 6)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A set of adjacent neighborhoods show evidence of merging together during the differentiation of germinal center B cells.
“a recent study found that a set of adjacent neighborhoods show evidence of “merging” together during the differentiation of germinal center B cells (Bunting et al., 2016)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bunting et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The striking similarity of TAD boundaries across cell types is produced largely by insulated neighborhood structures.
“which we argue is produced largely by insulated neighborhood structures (Figure 4A)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
CTCF binding to DNA can be modulated by post-translational modifications such as poly-ADP ribosylation.
“CTCF-binding to DNA can also be modulated by post-translational modifications such as poly-ADP ribosylation (Ong et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ong et al., 2013 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
TAD boundaries are strikingly similar across cell types.
“the striking similarity of TAD boundaries across cell types (Dixon et al., 2015; Dixon et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationnone given
Proper activation and repression of genes is dependent on the integrity of insulated neighborhoods.
“Evidence that proper activation and repression of genes is dependent on the integrity of insulated neighborhoods argues that these are structural and functional units of mammalian gene control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Targeted de-methylation with a dCas9-TET fusion protein has been demonstrated.
“Similarly, targeted de-methylation with a dCas9-TET fusion protein has been demonstrated (Amabile et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2016), and this strategy could be used to restore an insulated neighborhood whose anchor site is disrupted by aberrant DNA methylation (Figure 8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhoods are structural and functional units of mammalian gene control.
“argues that these are structural and functional units of mammalian gene control”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The insulated neighborhood model can explain how enhancer-promoter specificity is obtained when a single gene occurs together with its regulatory elements within the neighborhood.
“The insulated neighborhood model can explain how enhancer-promoter specificity is obtained when a single gene occurs together with its regulatory elements within the neighborhood, but it does not fully explain enhancer-promoter specificity when multiple genes are present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The insulated neighborhood model does not fully explain enhancer-promoter specificity when multiple genes are present.
“The insulated neighborhood model can explain how enhancer-promoter specificity is obtained when a single gene occurs together with its regulatory elements within the neighborhood, but it does not fully explain enhancer-promoter specificity when multiple genes are present.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Perturbation of the inside neighborhood anchors has little effect on globin gene expression.
“the β-globin genes are located in nested neighborhoods, and perturbation of the inside neighborhood anchors has little effect on globin gene expression (Bender et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bender et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhoods are rather stable.
“suggests that these neighborhoods are rather stable”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Mapping interactions between enhancers and promoters in disease-relevant cells improves the accuracy of assigning target genes.
“Mapping interactions between enhancers and promoters in disease-relevant cells improves the accuracy of the assignment (Grubert et al., 2015; McGeachie et al., 2016; Pomerantz et al., 2009), but this is not always feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Site-specific methylation and demethylation of a neighborhood anchor can alter neighborhood structures.
“This suggests that site-specific methylation and demethylation of a neighborhood anchor can alter neighborhood structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Non-coding RNA has been implicated in regulation of CTCF binding to DNA at certain loci.
“Non-coding RNA has also been implicated in regulation of CTCF binding to DNA at certain loci (Saldana-Meyer et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Saldana-Meyer et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The CTCF-CTCF loop and gene control at the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus suggests that insulated neighborhoods are sufficiently stable to prevent development of diseases associated with neighborhood dysregulation.
“The example of CTCF-CTCF loop and gene control at the imprinted IGF2/H19 locus suggests that the neighborhoods are sufficiently stable to prevent development of the diseases associated with neighborhood dysregulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Functional investigation of a genetic variant associated with Type 2 diabetes, previously assigned to CDC123 and CAMK1D based on proximity, revealed that the variant affects the distal CAMK1D gene and not CDC123.
“Similarly, functional investigation of a genetic variant associated with Type 2 diabetes, and previously assigned to the CDC123 and CAMK1D genes based on proximity, revealed that the variant affects the distal CAMK1D gene and not CDC123 (Fogarty et al., 2014; GTEx Consortium, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fogarty et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites GTEx Consortium, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The CTCF binding site in insulated neighborhood loop anchors is hypomethylated.
“The CTCF binding site in insulated neighborhood loop anchors is hypomethylated (Ji et al., 2016); DNA methylation abrogates CTCF DNA binding (Bell and Felsenfeld, 2000; Hark et al., 2000; Kanduri et al., 2000; Szabo et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The β-globin genes are located in nested neighborhoods.
“the β-globin genes are located in nested neighborhoods, and perturbation of the inside neighborhood anchors has little effect on globin gene expression (Bender et al., 2006)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bender et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
DNA methylation abrogates CTCF DNA binding.
“DNA methylation abrogates CTCF DNA binding (Bell and Felsenfeld, 2000; Hark et al., 2000; Kanduri et al., 2000; Szabo et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In ES cells, deletion of multiple boundary sites was required to observe changes in gene expression at certain loci.
“In ES cells, deletion of multiple boundary sites were required to observe changes in gene expression at certain loci (Dowen et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Insulated neighborhood maps can facilitate the identification of genes affected by non-coding genetic variants.
“These examples suggest that insulated neighborhood maps can facilitate the identification of genes affected by non-coding genetic variants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 30
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn human embryonic stem cells, there are ~13,000 insulated neighborhoods, which range from 25 kb to 940 kb in size, and contain from 1-10 genes.
“In human embryonic stem cells (ESCs), there are ~13,000 insulated neighborhoods, which range from 25 kb to 940 kb in size, and contain from 1 – 10 genes (Figure 2B) (Dowen et al., 2014; Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe majority of disease-associated non-coding variation occurs in the vicinity of enhancers and thus likely impacts these enhancers' target genes.
“This mystery, which we will call the enhancer-gene specificity conundrum, is important to solve because the majority of disease-associated non-coding variation occurs in the vicinity of enhancers and thus likely impacts these enhancers’ target genes (Ernst et al., 2011; Farh et al., 2015; Hnisz et al., 2013; Maurano et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHuman germline variation is rare in CTCF binding sites at insulated neighborhood boundaries and few GWAS variants occur in these sites.
“Human germline variation is rare in CTCF binding sites at insulated neighborhood boundaries and few GWAS variants occur in these sites (Ji et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeletion of a CTCF loop anchor site of the miR-290-295 neighborhood reduced expression of the miRNA precursor and activated an adjacent gene outside the neighborhood, concomitant with looping of the super-enhancer to this outside gene.
“For example, the miR-290–295 miRNA gene cluster, which plays important roles in ES cell pluripotency, occurs within an insulated neighborhood together with a super-enhancer; when a CTCF loop anchor site of this neighborhood was deleted, there was a reduction in expression of the miRNA precursor and activation of an adjacent gene outside of the neighborhood concomitant with looping of the super-enh”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAt least 50% of TADs have TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loops and are thus insulated neighborhoods.
“ChIA-PET data revealed that at least 50% of TADs have TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loops (Ji et al., 2016) and are thus insulated neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTCF-CTCF looping has been implicated in bringing DNA segments into spatial proximity and in constraining the off-target effects of the recombinase.
“CTCF-CTCF looping has been implicated in bringing these segments into spatial proximity and also in constraining the off-target effects of the recombinase (Dong et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dong et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hu et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe median insulated neighborhood is ~190 kb and contains 3 genes.
“The median insulated neighborhood is ~190kb and contains 3 genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dowen et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome TADs appear to be a single insulated neighborhood, while others consist of multiple nested or multiple independent insulated neighborhoods.
“Some TADs appear to be a single insulated neighborhood, while others consist of multiple nested or multiple independent insulated neighborhoods (Figure 4B–D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferent cell types share very similar insulated neighborhood boundaries, but the enhancer-gene interactions that occur within these neighborhoods are cell-type specific because enhancer activity is cell-type specific.
“While different cell types share very similar insulated neighborhood boundaries, the enhancer-gene interactions that occur within these neighborhoods are cell-type specific because enhancer activity is cell-type specific (Figure 3) (Ji et al., 2016; Smith et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ji et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smith et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSilent proto-oncogenes typically occur within insulated neighborhoods and genetic modification of the neighborhood loop anchors can cause activation of these oncogenes.
“Silent proto-oncogenes typically occur within insulated neighborhoods and genetic modification of the neighborhood loop anchors can cause activation of these oncogenes (Flavahan et al., 2016; Hnisz et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationCTCF contact domains are either insulated neighborhoods or clusters of insulated neighborhoods.
“These features suggest that CTCF contact domains are either insulated neighborhoods or clusters of insulated neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe anchor sites of CTCF contact domains are bound by CTCF and cohesin, and the CTCF anchors of ~90% of the CTCF contact domains occur in a convergent orientation.
“The anchor sites of CTCF contact domains are bound by CTCF and cohesin, and the CTCF anchors of ~90% of the CTCF contact domains occur in a convergent orientation (Tang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation70% of loop domains, and 54% CTCF contact domains have the same boundaries as an insulated neighborhood in human lymphoblastoid cells.
“For example, 70% of loop domains, and 54% CTCF contact domains have the same boundaries as an insulated neighborhood in human lymphoblastoid cells (Rao et al., 2014; Tang et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn vertebrates, the beta globin locus contains a cluster of fetal and adult globin genes, and the developmental control of these genes is exerted by an upstream regulatory element called the locus control region (LCR).
“In vertebrates, the beta globin locus contains a cluster of fetal and adult globin genes, and the developmental control of these genes is exerted by an upstream regulatory element called the locus control region (LCR) (Figure 6D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hou et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Splinter et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tolhuis et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation~5,000 chromatin loops whose boundaries are occupied by CTCF and cohesin in multiple human cell types were identified and termed loop domains.
“Another study used high-resolution hi-C technology to identify ~5,000 chromatin loops whose boundaries are occupied by CTCF and cohesin in multiple human cell types; these were termed “loop domains” (Rao et al., 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rao et al., 2014 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHereditary mutations that invert or delete a TAD boundary at the EPHA4 locus have been linked to limb malformations in humans, and this TAD has a TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loop in ES cells, indicating that it is an insulated neighborhood.
“Hereditary mutations that invert or delete a TAD boundary at the EPHA4 locus have recently been linked to limb malformations in humans (Lupianez et al., 2015), and this TAD has a TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loop in ES cells, indicating that it is an insulated neighborhood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lupianez et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn fetal brain cells, CTCF binding to one of the beta-globin loop anchor regions is absent and CTCF-CTCF loop formation is not detected.
“In fetal brain cells, CTCF binding to one of the beta-globin loop anchor regions is absent and CTCF-CTCF loop formation is not detected (Splinter et al., 2006; Tolhuis et al., 2002), which suggests that tissue-specific CTCF-CTCF loops participate in developmental gene control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Splinter et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tolhuis et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTCF sites located within a Hox gene cluster play a critical role in proper expression of Hox genes; some of these critical CTCF sites form insulated neighborhood anchors in ES cells.
“Positional information in the developing embryo depends on the precise expression of Homeobox (Hox) genes, and CTCF sites located within a Hox gene cluster play a critical role in proper expression of Hox genes (Narendra et al., 2015); some of these critical CTCF sites form insulated neighborhood anchors in ES cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Narendra et al., 2015 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe CTCF DNA binding motif is asymmetric and directional, and the CTCF anchors of >90% of loop domains occur in a convergent orientation.
“This and other studies have noted that the DNA binding motif of CTCF is asymmetric and thus directional, and the CTCF anchors of >90% the loop domains occur in a convergent orientation (de Wit et al., 2015; Gomez-Marin et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2015; Ji et al., 2016; Vietri Rudan et al., 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPaternal allele-specific DNA methylation of a CTCF site in the H19 promoter region abrogates CTCF binding, causing differential CTCF-CTCF loop formation while silencing H19 expression.
“Paternal allele-specific DNA methylation of a CTCF site in the H19 promoter region abrogates CTCF binding, thus causing differential CTCF-CTCF loop formation while silencing H19 expression (Bell and Felsenfeld, 2000; Hark et al., 2000; Kanduri et al., 2000; Szabo et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDNA hypermethylation occurs in some cancer cells, and tumor-specific DNA methylation has been implicated in the disruption of CTCF binding, alteration of chromosome structure and dysregulation of oncogene expression.
“DNA hypermethylation occurs in some cancer cells, and tumor-specific DNA methylation has recently been implicated in the disruption of CTCF binding, alteration of chromosome structure and dysregulation of oncogene expression (Flavahan et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Flavahan et al., 2016 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals who lose these allele-specific insulated neighborhoods develop Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or Silver-Russell syndrome.
“Individuals who lose these allele-specific insulated neighborhoods develop Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (when both alleles have the paternal type of insulated neighborhood; Figure 6B) or Silver-Russell syndrome (when both alleles have the maternal type of insulated neighborhood; Figure 6C) (Nativio et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nativio et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSub-TADs were found to be constitutively present in multiple cell types and cell type-specific enhancer-promoter contacts occurred within sub-TAD boundaries.
“Sub-TADs were found to be constitutively present in multiple cell types and cell type-specific enhancer-promoter contacts occurred within sub-TAD boundaries (Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phillips-Cremins et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCTCF binding and CTCF-CTCF loop formation can be cell type-specific.
“there is some evidence that CTCF binding and CTCF-CTCF loop formation can be cell type-specific (Narendra et al., 2015; Splinter et al., 2006; Tolhuis et al., 2002; Wang et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA genetic variant associated with obesity and previously assigned to the FTO gene has no impact on FTO, but affects the IRX3 and IRX5 genes.
“For example, a recent study revealed that a genetic variant associated with obesity and previously assigned to the FTO gene in fact has no impact on FTO, but affects the IRX3 and IRX5 genes (Claussnitzer et al., 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Claussnitzer et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCondensin is known to inhibit transvection in Drosophila polytene chromosomes, where it presumably prevents interactions between two alleles.
“Condensin is known to inhibit transvection in Drosophila polytene chromosomes, where it presumably prevents interactions between two alleles (Hartl et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hartl et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premiseown dataExamination of insulated neighborhood structures reveals that CAMK1D is located in the same neighborhood as the Type 2 diabetes variant, whereas CDC123 is not.
“Examination of insulated neighborhood structures reveals that CAMK1D is located in the same neighborhood as the variant, whereas CDC123 is not (Figure 7C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fogarty et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites GTEx Consortium, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe obesity-associated variant is located in an intronic enhancer within FTO, and both IRX3 and IRX5 are located in the same insulated neighborhood as the variant.
“Although the variant is located in an intronic enhancer within FTO, both IRX3 and IRX5 are located in the same insulated neighborhood as the variant (Figure 7B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Claussnitzer et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAdditional structuring of the neighborhood, such as condensing the looped chromatin into a compact ball, would reduce the opportunity to interact with other neighborhoods.
“Additional structuring of the neighborhood, such as condensing the looped chromatin into a compact ball, would reduce the opportunity to interact with other neighborhoods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: An element in a 2-D chromatin loop should be able to contact elements in other loops.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn Drosophila, a number of proteins have been identified that influence CTCF binding and insulator function.
“In Drosophila, a number of proteins have been identified that influence CTCF binding and insulator function (Phillips-Cremins and Corces, 2013)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phillips-Cremins and Corces, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDifferences in insulation strength at CTCF anchors might occur and perhaps correlate with certain genomic features.
“Early efforts to quantify insulation on a genome-wide scale suggest that differences in insulation strength at CTCF anchors might occur, and perhaps correlate with certain genomic features (Phillips-Cremins and Corces, 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Phillips-Cremins and Corces, 2013
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTens of thousands of non-coding genetic variants have been linked with various human diseases and traits in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and the majority of these variants occur in enhancers.
“Tens of thousands of non-coding genetic variants have been linked with various human diseases and traits in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and the majority of these variants occur in enhancers (Ernst et al., 2011; Farh et al., 2015; Hnisz et al., 2013; Maurano et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFeatures such as multiple CTCF binding sites and nesting appear to produce a higher insulation score for enhancers and genes within the neighborhood and may represent a safeguard against perturbation.
“These features appear to produce a higher “insulation score” for enhancers and genes within the neighborhood and may thus represent a safeguard against perturbation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Insulated neighborhoods can have boundaries with multiple CTCF binding sites and can be nested within larger insulated neighborhoods.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe experimental approaches used thus far to identify CTCF loops generally depend on the study of populations of cells, and thus the present data are inadequate to address questions of dynamics.
“The experimental approaches used thus far to identify CTCF loops generally depend on the study of populations of cells, and thus the present data are inadequate to address questions of dynamics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The existing ChIA-PET data is not saturating.
“Because the existing ChIA-PET data is not saturating, this is a minimal estimate; it is possible that the majority of TADs have TAD-spanning CTCF-CTCF loops.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Proximity-based assignment of target genes to non-coding genetic variants has proven, in some cases, to be inaccurate.
“The identification of the target genes of these variants is challenging because proximity-based assignment has proven, in some cases, to be inaccurate.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Enhancers and their associated factors can regulate expression of genes located far upstream or downstream by looping to the promoters of these genes.
“Enhancers and their associated factors can regulate expression of genes located far upstream or downstream by looping to the promoters of these genes, so the features that cause enhancers to regulate only specific genes, generally on their own chromosomes, has been something of a mystery for several decades (Figure 1A).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Insulated neighborhoods can have boundaries with multiple CTCF binding sites and can be nested within larger insulated neighborhoods.
“Insulated neighborhoods can have boundaries with multiple CTCF binding sites and can be nested within larger insulated neighborhoods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An element in a 2-D chromatin loop should be able to contact elements in other loops.
“An element in a 2-D chromatin loop should be able to contact elements in other loops.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhancers are punctate relative to broader chromatin domains, but their in vivo functionality depends on chromatin context and the trans milieu.
“Enhancers are ‘punctate’ relative to broader chromatin domains (e.g. chromosomes, topologically associating domains [G] (TADs) and sub-compartments of TADs87), but their in vivo functionality is dependent on both the chromatin context in which they reside88 and on the trans milieu (e.g. cell-type-specific TFs)89.”
From Towards a comprehensive catalogue of validated and target-linked human enhancers (2020) · cites this paper as [87]
CTCF/Cohesin sites dispersed within TADs are thought to contribute to the formation of smaller self-interacting domains termed sub-TADs, contact domains, and insulated neighborhoods.
“These CTCF/Cohesin sites are thought to contribute to the formation of smaller self-interacting domains that have been termed sub-TADs18, contact domains19, and insulated neighborhoods11,20.”
From Tissue-specific CTCF-cohesin-mediated chromatin architecture delimits enhancer interactions and function in vivo (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 107 · Cited by 420
- Authors
- Hnisz, D., Day, D. S., & Young, R. A.
- Affiliations
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hnisz, Denes
- Day, Daniel S.
- Young, Richard A.
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 167
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1188-1200
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5125522
- OpenAlex
- W2556041461
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 107
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PMC
- Funders
- National Human Genome Research Institute (R01HG002668)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- CTCF, cohesin, chromatin looping, enhancers, enhancer-gene interactions, cell type-specific gene expression, gene expression regulation, epigenetic regulation, chromatin structure, developmental gene regulation, disease
- MeSH terms
- CCCTC-Binding Factor, Animals, Chromosomes, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Mammals, Repressor Proteins, Insulator Elements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review