Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 456

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancer Reprogramming Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis

Open access
Roe, Jae-Seok, Hwang, Chang-Il, Somerville, Tim D.D., Milazzo, Joseph P., Lee, Eun Jung, Da Silva, Brandon, Maiorino, Laura, Tiriac, Hervé, Young, C. Megan, Miyabayashi, Koji, Filippini, Dea, Creighton, Brianna, Burkhart, Richard A., Buscaglia, Jonathan M., Kim, Edward J., Grem, Jean L., Lazenby, Audrey J., Grunkemeyer, James A., Hollingsworth, Michael A., Grandgenett, Paul M., Egeblad, Mikala, Park, Youngkyu, Tuveson, David A., Vakoc, Christopher R.·2017·Cell

Abstract

Summary Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is one of the most lethal human malignancies, owing in part to its propensity for metastasis. Here, we used an organoid culture system to investigate how transcription and the enhancer landscape become altered during discrete stages of disease progression in a PDA mouse model. This approach revealed that the metastatic transition is accompanied by massive and recurrent alterations in enhancer activity. We implicate the pioneer factor FOXA1 as a driver of enhancer activation in this system, a mechanism that renders PDA cells more invasive and less anchorage-dependent for growth in vitro, as well as more metastatic in vivo. In this context, FOXA1-dependent enhancer reprogramming activates a transcriptional program of embryonic foregut endoderm. Collectively, our study implicates enhancer reprogramming, FOXA1 upregulation, and a retrograde developmental transition in PDA metastasis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.007

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 456

Metadata

Authors
Roe, J.-S., Hwang, C.-I., Somerville, T. D. D., Milazzo, J. P., Lee, E. J., Da Silva, B., Maiorino, L., Tiriac, H., Young, C. M., Miyabayashi, K., Filippini, D., Creighton, B., Burkhart, R. A., Buscaglia, J. M., Kim, E. J., Grem, J. L., Lazenby, A. J., Grunkemeyer, J. A., Hollingsworth, M. A., Grandgenett, P. M., Egeblad, M., Park, Y., Tuveson, D. A., & Vakoc, C. R.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
170
Issue
5
Pages
875-888.e20
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2742000848
Cited by
456
References
22
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancer Reprogramming Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.007
The paper
Roe, J.-S., Hwang, C.-I., Somerville, T. D. D., Milazzo, J. P., Lee, E. J., Da Silva, B., Maiorino, L., Tiriac, H., Young, C. M., Miyabayashi, K., Filippini, D., Creighton, B., Burkhart, R. A., Buscaglia, J. M., Kim, E. J., Grem, J. L., Lazenby, A. J., Grunkemeyer, J. A., Hollingsworth, M. A., . . . Vakoc, C. R. (2017). Enhancer Reprogramming Promotes Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.