Cited by 3,515Gene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Next Generation Connectivity Map: L1000 Platform and the First 1,000,000 Profiles

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We previously piloted the concept of a Connectivity Map (CMap), whereby genes, drugs, and disease states are connected by virtue of common gene-expression signatures. Here, we report more than a 1,000-fold scale-up of the CMap as part of the NIH LINCS Consortium, made possible by a new, low-cost, high-throughput reduced representation expression profiling method that we term L1000. We show that L1000 is highly reproducible, comparable to RNA sequencing, and suitable for computational inference of the expression levels of 81% of non-measured transcripts. We further show that the expanded CMap can be used to discover mechanism of action of small molecules, functionally annotate genetic variants of disease genes, and inform clinical trials. The 1.3 million L1000 profiles described here, as well as tools for their analysis, are available at https://clue.io.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.049

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Illumina Inc. (2007). BeadStudio Normalization Algorithms for Gene Expression Data (Illumina Technical Bulletin Pub. No.470-2007-005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,010

Metadata

Authors
Subramanian, A., Narayan, R., Corsello, S. M., Peck, D. D., Natoli, T. E., Lu, X., Gould, J., Davis, J. F., Tubelli, A. A., Asiedu, J. K., Lahr, D. L., Hirschman, J. E., Liu, Z., Donahue, M., Julian, B., Khan, M., Wadden, D., Smith, I. C., Lam, D., Liberzon, A., Toder, C., Bagul, M., Orzechowski, M., Enache, O. M., Piccioni, F., Johnson, S. A., Lyons, N. J., Berger, A. H., Shamji, A. F., Brooks, A. N., Vrcic, A., Flynn, C., Rosains, J., Takeda, D. Y., Hu, R., Davison, D., Lamb, J., Ardlie, K., Hogstrom, L., Greenside, P., Gray, N. S., Clemons, P. A., Silver, S., Wu, X., Zhao, W.-N., Read-Button, W., Wu, X., Haggarty, S. J., Ronco, L. V., Boehm, J. S., Schreiber, S. L., Doench, J. G., Bittker, J. A., Root, D. E., Wong, B., & Golub, T. R.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Golub, Todd R.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
171
Issue
6
Pages
1437-1452.e17
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612467560
Cited by
3,515
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 436 · 2025: 479 · 2024: 493 · 2023: 458 · 2022: 507 · 2021: 421 · 2020: 320 · 2019: 261 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 12
FWCI
80.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (U54HG006093, U54HL127366, U01HG008699, CA009172, TR001100)
  • Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO Young
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
Connectivity Map, L1000, gene expression signatures, functional annotation of genetic variants, reproducibility, clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Neoplasms, Organ Specificity, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Gene Expression Profiling, Cell Line, Tumor, Small Molecule Libraries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review