Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 819

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato

Open access
Alonge, Michael, Wang, Xingang, Benoit, Matthias, Soyk, Sebastian, Pereira, Lara, Zhang, Lei, Suresh, Hamsini, Ramakrishnan, Srividya, Maumus, Florian, Ciren, Danielle, Levy, Yuval, Harel, Tom Hai, Shalev-Schlosser, Gili, Amsellem, Ziva, Razifard, Hamid, Caicedo, Ana L., Tieman, Denise M., Klee, Harry, Kirsche, Melanie, Aganezov, Sergey, Ranallo-Benavidez, T. Rhyker, Lemmon, Zachary H., Kim, Jennifer, Robitaille, Gina, Kramer, Melissa, Goodwin, Sara, McCombie, W. Richard, Hutton, Samuel, Van Eck, Joyce, Gillis, Jesse, Eshed, Yuval, Sedlazeck, Fritz J., van der Knaap, Esther, Schatz, Michael C., Lippman, Zachary B.·2020·Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY Structural variants (SVs) underlie important crop improvement and domestication traits. However, resolving the extent, diversity, and quantitative impact of SVs has been challenging. We used long-read nanopore sequencing to capture 238,490 SVs in 100 diverse tomato lines. This panSV-genome, along with 14 new reference assemblies, revealed large-scale intermixing of diverse genotypes, as well as thousands of SVs intersecting genes and cis-regulatory regions. Hundreds of SV-gene pairs exhibit subtle and significant expression changes, which could broadly influence quantitative trait variation. By combining quantitative genetics with genome editing, we show how multiple SVs that changed gene dosage and expression levels modified fruit flavor, size, and production. In the last example, higher-order epistasis among four SVs affecting three related transcription factors allowed introduction of an important harvesting trait in modern tomato. Our findings highlight the underexplored role of SVs in genotype-tophenotype relationships and their widespread importance and utility in crop improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.021

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Cited by

See all 819

Metadata

Authors
Alonge, M., Wang, X., Benoit, M., Soyk, S., Pereira, L., Zhang, L., Suresh, H., Ramakrishnan, S., Maumus, F., Ciren, D., Levy, Y., Harel, T. H., Shalev-Schlosser, G., Amsellem, Z., Razifard, H., Caicedo, A. L., Tieman, D. M., Klee, H., Kirsche, M., Aganezov, S., Ranallo-Benavidez, T. R., Lemmon, Z. H., Kim, J., Robitaille, G., Kramer, M., Goodwin, S., McCombie, W. R., Hutton, S., Van Eck, J., Gillis, J., Eshed, Y., Sedlazeck, F. J., van der Knaap, E., Schatz, M. C., & Lippman, Z. B.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
182
Issue
1
Pages
145-161.e23
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036928921
Cited by
819
References
95
FWCI
67.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.021
The paper
Alonge, M., Wang, X., Benoit, M., Soyk, S., Pereira, L., Zhang, L., Suresh, H., Ramakrishnan, S., Maumus, F., Ciren, D., Levy, Y., Harel, T. H., Shalev-Schlosser, G., Amsellem, Z., Razifard, H., Caicedo, A. L., Tieman, D. M., Klee, H., Kirsche, M., . . . Lippman, Z. B. (2020). Major Impacts of Widespread Structural Variation on Gene Expression and Crop Improvement in Tomato. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.021

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.