Cited by 88SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

T cell reactivity to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is preserved in most but not all individuals

Open access
Naranbhai, Vivek, Nathan, Anusha, Kaseke, Clarety, Berrios, Cristhian, Khatri, Ashok, Choi, Shawn, Getz, Matthew A., Tano-Menka, Rhoda +12 more·2022·Cell

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

(Cell 185, 1041–1051.e1–e6; March 17, 2022) In our originally published article, an error in production resulted in mistakes to the citations and references for Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021a, 2021b, and 2022. At publication, Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021a referred to the Correction for the original Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021a, which ran in Cell volume 184 on page 2532; instead, it should refer to the original article, which ran in Cell volume 184 on pages 2372–2383.e9. Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021b referred to the BioRxiv pre-print publication of Garcia-Beltran et al., 2022; instead, it should refer to Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021, Cell 184, 476–488.e11. The references have now been corrected online. To coincide with corrections to the references, the citations in the following sentences have also been corrected as indicated: • “Additional booster vaccine doses partially compensate for this effect (Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021b; Hoffmann et al., 2021)” now refers to Garcia-Beltran et al. (2022). • “Within this cohort of individuals, we recently reported markedly reduced neutralization of Omicron following primary series vaccination, which was overcome by additional ‘booster’ doses (Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021b)” now refers to Garcia-Beltran et al. (2022). • “Using a pseudoneutralization titer threshold of 20 (Garcia-Beltran et al., 2022)” now refers to Garcia-Beltran et al. (2021b). • In Figure 4D, “Dotted lines denote a pseudoneutralization titer threshold of 20 (Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021c)” now refers to Garcia-Beltran et al. (2021b). • “The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant demonstrates substantial escape from neutralizing antibody responses (Garcia-Beltran et al., 2021b; Hoffmann et al., 2021)” now refers to Garcia-Beltran et al. (2022). The journal apologizes for any confusion these errors may have caused. T cell reactivity to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant is preserved in most but not all individualsNaranbhai et al.CellFebruary 2, 2022In BriefT cells from most SARS-CoV-2 infected and/or vaccinated individuals have preserved reactivity to the Omicron variant, and their reactivity is enhanced by booster vaccination. However, ∼20% of individuals have reduced T cell recognition of the Omicron spike, potentially due to escape of HLA class I-restricted epitopes. Full-Text PDF Open Access

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2022.03.022

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.04.21268586; this version posted January 5, 2022. The copyright holder for this preprint · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naranbhai, V., Nathan, A., Kaseke, C., Berrios, C., Khatri, A., Choi, S., Getz, M. A., Tano-Menka, R., Ofoman, O., Gayton, A., Senjobe, F., Zhao, Z., St Denis, K. J., Lam, E. C., Carrington, M., Garcia-Beltran, W. F., Balazs, A. B., Walker, B. D., Iafrate, A. J., & Gaiha, G. D.
Corresponding author
  • Naranbhai, Vivek
  • Gaiha, Gaurav D.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-03
Volume
185
Issue
7
Pages
1259
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226089887
Cited by
88
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 49 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard
  • Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
  • National Institutes of Health (DK011794)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DP2DA040254)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI149704, UM1AI144462)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
T cell response, Omicron variant, COVID-19 pandemic, cross-reactivity, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, neutralizing antibodies, antibody escape, booster vaccination, T cell memory, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, SARS-CoV

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review