Cited by 1,068SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Correlates of Protection Against SARS-CoV-2 in Rhesus Macaques

Open access
McMahan, Katherine, Yu, Jingyou, Mercado, Noe B., Loos, Carolin, Tostanoski, Lisa H., Chandrashekar, Abishek, Liu, Jinyan, Peter, Lauren +22 more·2021·Nature

Abstract

Recent studies have reported the protective efficacy of both natural 1 and vaccine-induced 2-7 immunity against challenge with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in rhesus macaques. However, the importance of humoral and cellular immunity for protection against infection with SARS-CoV-2 remains to be determined. Here we show that the adoptive transfer of purified IgG from convalescent rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) protects naive recipient macaques against challenge with SARS-CoV-2 in a dose-dependent fashion. Depletion of CD8+ T cells in convalescent macaques partially abrogated the protective efficacy of natural immunity against rechallenge with SARS-CoV-2, which suggests a role for cellular immunity in the context of waning or subprotective antibody titres. These data demonstrate that relatively low antibody titres are sufficient for protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques, and that cellular immune responses may contribute to protection if antibody responses are suboptimal. We also show that higher antibody titres are required for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in macaques. These findings have implications for the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and immune-based therapeutic agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-020-03041-6

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Binding and neutralizing antibody titres are important correlates of protection for these SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in non-human primates.

    “Consistent with prior observations from our laboratory and others15,16,22, these findings suggest that binding and neutralizing antibody titres are important correlates of protection for these SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in non-human primates.”

    From Optimization of non-coding regions for a non-modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The IgG Adoptive Transfer Protection Study reports protection thresholds for neutralizing titres and binding-antibody ELISA titres in rhesus macaques. The Discussion also says neutralizing titres correlated with protection in earlier DNA and Ad26 vaccine studies. This paper’s direct binding-titre evidence comes from transfer of convalescent IgG, however, rather than from vaccinated animals, so it does not directly establish both as correlates for the vaccines. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neutralizing antibody titres elicited by CV2CoV to viral variants exceeded the values previously reported as threshold titres for protection (50-100).

    “Although our challenge virus in this study was SARS-CoV-2 WA1/2020, the neutralizing antibody titres elicited by CV2CoV to viral variants exceeded the values we previously reported as threshold titres for protection (50–100)17,19,22.”

    From Optimization of non-coding regions for a non-modified mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    The IgG Adoptive Transfer Protection Study (page unavailable) reports a pseudovirus neutralizing-antibody threshold of approximately 50 in rhesus macaques. Its approximately 100 threshold is for RBD ELISA binding titres, not neutralizing-antibody titres. The paper therefore supports the lower end of the cited 50–100 range, but not the full range as neutralizing-antibody thresholds; it does not assess CV2CoV variant titres. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CD8+ T cells contribute to virological control of SARS-CoV-2 infection when antibody titres are sub-optimal in non-human primates.

    “CD8+ T cells have been shown to contribute to virological control of SARS-CoV-2 infection when antibodies titres were sub-optimal in non-human primates33,34.”
  • Depletion of CD8+ T cells partially abrogated protective efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 re-challenge in convalescent macaques.

    “We previously reported that depletion of CD8+ T cells partially abrogated protective efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 re-challenge in convalescent macaques22.”
  • Depletion of CD8+ T cells at 7 weeks after infection in macaques resulted in partial loss of protection from re-challenge.

    “the depletion of CD8+ T cells at 7 weeks after infection in macaques resulted in a partial loss of protection from re-challenge48.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahan, K., Yu, J., Mercado, N. B., Loos, C., Tostanoski, L. H., Chandrashekar, A., Liu, J., Peter, L., Atyeo, C., Zhu, A., Bondzie, E. A., Dagotto, G., Gebre, M. S., Jacob-Dolan, C., Li, Z., Nampanya, F., Patel, S., Pessaint, L., Van Ry, A., Blade, K., Yalley-Ogunro, J., Cabus, M., Brown, R., Cook, A., Teow, E., Andersen, H., Lewis, M. G., Lauffenburger, D. A., Alter, G., & Barouch, D. H.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Bioqual (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Barouch, Dan H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2020-12-04
Volume
590
Issue
7847
Pages
630-634
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W3108193091
Cited by
1,068
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 177 · 2022: 360 · 2021: 317 · 2020: 7
FWCI
28.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • PMC
  • ImmPort
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-006131)
  • Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness
  • National Institutes of Health (R01OD024917, CA260476, AI128751, U42OD021458, P40OD012217)
  • National Cancer Institute (U01CA260476)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI129797, UM1AI124377, UM1AI126603, U19AI128751, T32AI007387)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 pandemic, rhesus monkeys, humoral immunity, cell-mediated immunity, CD8+ T cells, antibody titers, waning immunity, drug rechallenge, passive immunotherapy, vaccine development
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Serotherapy, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Immunoglobulin G, Immunization, Passive, Macaca mulatta, Male, Regression Analysis, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Adoptive Transfer, Viral Load

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review