Cited by 281Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersPluripotent Stem Cells Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 31 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Transplantation of chemically induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived islets under abdominal anterior rectus sheath in a type 1 diabetes patient.

Open access
Wang, Shusen, Du, Yuanyuan, Zhang, Boya, Meng, Gaofan, Liu, Zewen, Liew, Soon Yi, Liang, Rui, Zhang, Zhengyuan, Cai, Xiangheng, Wu, Shuangshuang, Gao, Wei, Zhuang, Dewei, Zou, Jiaqi, Huang, Hui, Wang, Mingyang, Wang, Xiaofeng, Wang, Xuelian, Liang, Ting, Liu, Tengli, Gu, Jiabin, Liu, Na, Wei, Yanling, Ding, Xuejie, Pu, Yue, Zhan, Yixiang, Luo, Yu, Sun, Peng, Xie, Shuangshuang, Yang, Jiuxia, Weng, Yiqi, Zhou, Chunlei, Wang, Zhenglu, Wang, Shuang, Deng, Hongkui, Shen, Zhongyang·2024·Cell

Abstract

We report the 1-year results from one patient as the preliminary analysis of a first-in-human phase I clinical trial (ChiCTR2300072200) assessing the feasibility of autologous transplantation of chemically induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived islets (CiPSC islets) beneath the abdominal anterior rectus sheath for type 1 diabetes treatment. The patient achieved sustained insulin independence starting 75 days post-transplantation. The patient's time-in-target glycemic range increased from a baseline value of 43.18% to 96.21% by month 4 post-transplantation, accompanied by a decrease in glycated hemoglobin, an indicator of long-term systemic glucose levels at a non-diabetic level. Thereafter, the patient presented a state of stable glycemic control, with time-in-target glycemic range at >98% and glycated hemoglobin at around 5%. At 1 year, the clinical data met all study endpoints with no indication of transplant-related abnormalities. Promising results from this patient suggest that further clinical studies assessing CiPSC-islet transplantation in type 1 diabetes are warranted.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a first-in-human phase I trial (ChiCTR2300072200), a 25-year-old woman with 11-year type 1 diabetes received an autologous transplant of chemically induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived islets (CiPSC islets) beneath the abdominal anterior rectus sheath and achieved sustained insulin independence from day 75 post-transplantation. At 1 year, all study endpoints were met with no transplant-related abnormalities detected.

Key findings

  • The patient achieved complete insulin independence on day 75 and remained insulin-independent through 1 year of follow-up; daily exogenous insulin had been 54 ± 0.9 units/day at baseline.
  • Time-in-target glycemic range rose from a baseline of 43.18% to 87.18% at month 2 and 96.21% at month 4, and was >98% for 8 months by the 1-year endpoint; HbA1c fell from 7.57% at baseline to 6.50% at day 75 and 5.37% at day 120, remaining in the non-diabetic range (<5.7%) thereafter.
  • Graft function: fasting C-peptide was undetectable at baseline, rose to 59.6–102.6 pmol/L by week 2, and plateaued at 407.1–721.6 pmol/L after insulin independence; BETA-2 score increased from 0.13 at baseline to 21.42 at day 75 and 41.83 at day 365. OGTT peak C-peptide was 1,847.0, 1,439.9, and 2,472.6 pmol/L at days 180, 270, and 365 (3.5-, 2.8-, and 3.4-fold over fasting).
  • Safety: no treatment-emergent serious adverse events; treatment-emergent AEs were limited to the peri-transplantation period (puncture-site pain, nausea/vomiting from general anesthesia); no severe hypoglycemic events during follow-up; MRI (T2W-FS and T1W-FS) and tumor markers (β-HCG, AFP, CEA, CA125, CA15-3, CA19-9) showed no evidence of teratoma over 1 year.

Methods

  • First patient of an ongoing first-in-human phase I trial (TJFCH-iPS-001; ChiCTR2300072200) evaluating safety, tolerability, and efficacy of autologous CiPSC islets in type 1 diabetes; primary endpoints were HbA1c <7.0% or a ≥1% decrease from baseline at 90–365 days, absence of severe hypoglycemic events, and safety/tolerability; secondary endpoints included insulin independence and stimulated C-peptide ≥0.3 ng/mL.
  • Autologous CiPSCs were generated from the patient's adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells by a four-step small-molecule chemical reprogramming protocol (clone CiPSC-#8 selected from 23 colonies), then differentiated via a six-stage protocol into islet-like cells; release testing included dd-PCR for residual PSCs, WGS/WES, viability (98%), CHGA positivity (94.5%), and a glucose stimulation index of 1.37.
  • 1,488,283 IEQ (19,843 IEQ/kg) were injected under ultrasound guidance into the abdominal anterior rectus sheath on June 25, 2023, across 7 injections; the patient continued existing immunosuppression (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, methylprednisolone) with basiliximab and etanercept induction. Outcomes were tracked by continuous glucose monitoring, HbA1c, C-peptide, OGTT, BETA-2 score, ultrasound/MRI, tumor markers, and autoantibodies.

Limitations

  • Stated by the paper: safety and efficacy beyond 1 year and in more patients remain to be evaluated; the trial includes three patients total, and data from the second and third patients were not yet mature for reporting, so a larger cohort is warranted.
  • Stated by the paper: the patient's pre-existing immunosuppression for a transplanted liver precluded evaluation of the recipient's immune response to the autologous graft, limiting insight into potential autoimmune response.
  • Evident from the text: this is a single-patient report, so no control group or between-patient comparison is possible, and the concurrent immunosuppressive regimen (including basiliximab and etanercept induction) cannot be separated from the graft's contribution to the observed outcomes.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2024.09.004

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

4 of 31 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 75 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 51
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 54
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
90 of 90
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The extraperitoneal transplant site has minimal invasiveness of injection and ease of imaging.

    “Other important advantages of this self-contained extraperitoneal transplant site include minimal invasiveness of injection at the site and ease of imaging.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The clinical improvements observed after transplantation are attributable to the transplanted CiPSC-islets rather than to other factors such as the immunosuppressive regimen, residual endogenous insulin secretion, or the natural history of the patient’s diabetes.

    “After CiPSC-islet transplantation, the patient achieved insulin independence within 3 months post-transplantation, ultimately achieving over 98% blood glucose TIR without exogenous insulin use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of tumorigenicity observed in mice and nonhuman primates predicts the absence of tumorigenicity in the human patient.

    “Prior to the clinical study, the patient CiPSC-islets were assessed in 244 immunodeficient mice in transplantation experiments, with no tumorigenesis observed in all transplanted mice (Table S2).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The patient’s immunosuppressive maintenance regimen did not confound the glycemic or graft-function outcomes attributed to the CiPSC-islet transplant.

    “the immunosuppressive maintenance regimen included tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone tablets, which were continued after CiPSC transplantation”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The abdominal anterior rectus sheath site is safe and effective for stem-cell-derived islet transplantation in humans based on preclinical studies.

    “The positive metabolic data seen in this clinical study are consistent with that seen in our preclinical study in nonhuman primates, in which we sought to identify an optimal transplant site for CiPSC-islets.21”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease.

    “Because T1D is an autoimmune disease”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Cryopreserved cells per vial differ between preparation and thawing

    Major

    The stated cryopreservation concentration and 4 mL aliquot give 1.2 × 10^8 cells per vial, but the thawing procedure says each vial contained 1.8 × 10^8 cells.

  • Claim of no added immunosuppression conflicts with induction therapy

    Minor

    The paper says the transplantation did not add to the patient's immunosuppression burden, but it also reports giving basiliximab as induction therapy in addition to her existing maintenance regimen.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Du, Y., Zhang, B., Meng, G., Liu, Z., Liew, S. Y., Liang, R., Zhang, Z., Cai, X., Wu, S., Gao, W., Zhuang, D., Zou, J., Huang, H., Wang, M., Wang, X., Wang, X., Liang, T., Liu, T., Gu, J., Liu, N., Wei, Y., Ding, X., Pu, Y., Zhan, Y., Luo, Y., Sun, P., Xie, S., Yang, J., Weng, Y., Zhou, C., Wang, Z., Wang, S., Deng, H., & Shen, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Nankai University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Shusen
  • Deng, Hongkui
  • Shen, Zhongyang
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-10
Volume
187
Issue
22
Pages
6152-6164.e18
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402843606
Cited by
281
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 120 · 2025: 143 · 2024: 17
FWCI
117.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070805, 32288102, 82100841, NKTM2023002)
  • Tianjin Municipal Human Resources and Social Security Bureau (XB202011)
  • Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (22JCZXJC00110, 2023C03019)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0803704)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet transplantation, autologous transplantation, anterior rectus sheath, insulin independence, glycemic control, HbA1c
MeSH terms
Single-Case Studies as Topic, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Rectus Abdominis, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review