Cited by 160Nerve injury and regenerationNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Evidence for an Age-Dependent Decline in Axon Regeneration in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System

Open access
Geoffroy, Cédric G., Hilton, Brett J., Tetzlaff, Wolfram, Zheng, Binhai·2016·Cell Reports

Abstract

How aging impacts axon regeneration after CNS injury is not known. We assessed the impact of age on axon regeneration induced by Pten deletion in corticospinal and rubrospinal neurons, two neuronal populations with distinct innate regenerative abilities. As in young mice, Pten deletion in older mice remains effective in preventing axotomy-induced decline in neuron-intrinsic growth state, as assessed by mTOR activity, neuronal soma size, and axonal growth proximal to a spinal cord injury. However, axonal regeneration distal to injury is greatly diminished, accompanied by increased expression of astroglial and inflammatory markers at the injury site. Thus, the mammalian CNS undergoes an age-dependent decline in axon regeneration, as revealed when neuron-intrinsic growth state is elevated. These results have important implications for developing strategies to promote axonal repair after CNS injuries or diseases, which increasingly affect middle-aged to aging populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.028

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many regenerative approaches that work well in young individuals often fail in older ones.

    “Many regenerative approaches that work well in young individuals often fail in older ones25,26.”

    From Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision (2020) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page not provided) report that Pten deletion promotes axon regeneration in young mice but has a greatly diminished effect in older mice. The paper tests one approach in mice; it does not establish that many approaches often fail in older individuals, and it describes diminished regeneration rather than complete failure. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geoffroy, C. G., Hilton, B. J., Tetzlaff, W., & Zheng, B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Tetzlaff, Wolfram
  • Zheng, Binhai
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
238-246
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2319017449
Cited by
159
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
8.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Institute on Aging (T32AG000216)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS054734, P30NS047101, R01NS093055)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
axon regeneration, aging, central nervous system injury, PTEN deletion, corticospinal neurons, rubrospinal neurons, axotomy, neuronal soma size, astroglial activation, neuroinflammation, spinal cord injury, axonal repair
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Astrocytes, Axons, Central Nervous System, Inflammation, Mammals, Nerve Regeneration, Pyramidal Tracts, Spinal Cord Injuries, Signal Transduction, Biomarkers, Down-Regulation, Gene Deletion, Axotomy, PTEN Phosphohydrolase, Mice, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review