Cited by 328Nerve injury and regenerationSpinal Cord Injury ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Regulation of axonal regeneration after mammalian spinal cord injury

Zheng, Binhai, Tuszynski, Mark H.·2023·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

One hundred years ago, Ramón y Cajal, considered by many as the founder of modern neuroscience, stated that neurons of the adult central nervous system (CNS) are incapable of regenerating. Yet, recent years have seen a tremendous expansion of knowledge in the molecular control of axon regeneration after CNS injury. We now understand that regeneration in the adult CNS is limited by (1) a failure to form cellular or molecular substrates for axon attachment and elongation through the lesion site; (2) environmental factors, including inhibitors of axon growth associated with myelin and the extracellular matrix; (3) astrocyte responses, which can both limit and support axon growth; and (4) intraneuronal mechanisms controlling the establishment of an active cellular growth programme. We discuss these topics together with newly emerging hypotheses, including the surprising finding from transcriptomic analyses of the corticospinal system in mice that neurons revert to an embryonic state after spinal cord injury, which can be sustained to promote regeneration with neural stem cell transplantation. These gains in knowledge are steadily advancing efforts to develop effective treatment strategies for spinal cord injury in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-022-00562-y

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, B., & Tuszynski, M. H.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
  • Zheng, Binhai
  • Tuszynski, Mark H.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2023-01-05
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
396-413
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W4313569219
Cited by
328
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 31
FWCI
12.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 RX002483)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS054734, R01NS093055)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
axon regeneration, spinal cord injury, central nervous system regeneration, myelin, extracellular matrix, astrocyte response, corticospinal system, transcriptomics, neural stem cell transplantation, functional recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Humans, Mammals, Nerve Regeneration, Neurons, Spinal Cord Injuries, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review