Cited by 77Protein Structure and DynamicsMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Computational design of epitope-specific functional antibodies

Open access
Nimrod, Guy, Fischman, Sharon, Austin, Mark, Herman, Asael, Keyes, Feenagh, Leiderman, Olga, Hargreaves, David, Strajbl, Marek +7 more·2018·Cell Reports

Abstract

The ultimate goal of protein design is to introduce new biological activity. We propose a computational approach for designing functional antibodies by focusing on functional epitopes, integrating large-scale statistical analysis with multiple structural models. Machine learning is used to analyze these models and predict specific residue-residue contacts. We use this approach to design a functional antibody to counter the proinflammatory effect of the cytokine interleukin-17A (IL-17A). X-ray crystallography confirms that the designed antibody binds the targeted epitope and the interaction is mediated by the designed contacts. Cell-based assays confirm that the antibody is functional. Importantly, this approach does not rely on a high-quality 3D model of the designed complex or even a solved structure of the target. As demonstrated here, this approach can be used to design biologically active antibodies, removing some of the main hurdles in antibody design and in drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.081

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nimrod et al. proposed a strategy of re-epitoping using similarity to epitopes of known antibody-antigen complexes for antibody design.

    “Nimrod et al. [92] proposed a strategy of re-epitoping [i.e., using similarity to epitopes of known antibodyantigen complexes for their antibody design strategy.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nimrod, G., Fischman, S., Austin, M., Herman, A., Keyes, F., Leiderman, O., Hargreaves, D., Strajbl, M., Breed, J., Klompus, S., Minton, K., Spooner, J., Buchanan, A., Vaughan, T. J., & Ofran, Y.
Affiliations
  • AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Ofran, Yanay
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
2121-2131.e5
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901312940
Cited by
77
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
GIF (1327)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
antibody design, epitope-specific antibodies, protein design, IL-17A, IL-17A inhibition, residue-residue contact prediction, machine learning, structural model, inflammatory cytokines, antibody-antigen binding
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Antibodies, Antibody Specificity, Epitopes, Humans, Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments, Models, Molecular, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review