The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peels: Optimization, kinetics, and comparison with ultrasounds extraction
Abstract
Abstract Recently, there has been much interest in the phenolics of pomegranate peels, because of their health benefits, such as antioxidant activity. Thus, the objective of this work is to optimize an efficient alternative and “green” technique for the extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peels. Microwave-assisted method was found to increase extraction yield, but mainly to shorten the treatment time by over 60 times compared to conventional extraction methods. The effects of solvent type, solvent/solid ratio, and microwave power on the yield of phenolics extraction were studied. The optimum operating conditions were found to be: solvent type, 50% aqueous ethanol; solvent/solid ratio, 60/1 mL/g; power, 600 W. The efficiency of the proposed extraction protocol was compared with that of the ultrasound-assisted extraction, another “green” extraction approach, studied in our previous work. The microwaves method had a yield about 1.7 times higher obtained in a shorter process time (4 min) in comparison to ultrasound-assisted extraction (10 min). These differences were attributed to the intense cell destruction of microwave-treated plant material observed by SEM analysis. The obtained extract presented a high antioxidant activity (radical scavenging activity of 94.91%), due to the high content of punicalagin (143.64 mg/g dry matter) measured by HPLC analysis, that was equivalent to that of the ultrasounds extract (radical scavenging activity, 94.77%; punicalagin content, 138.8 mg/g dry matter).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spigno, G., Tramelli, L., & De Faveri, D. M. (2007) · Journal of Food Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.10.021 · Cited by 1,061
Vinatoru, M., Mason, T. J., & Calinescu, I. (2017) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2017.09.002 · Cited by 710
Optimization of microwave assisted extraction of pectin from orange peel
Prakash Maran, J., Sivakumar, V., Thirugnanasambandham, K., & Sridhar, R. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.052 · Cited by 345
Continuous and pulsed ultrasound-assisted extractions of antioxidants from pomegranate peel
Pan, Z., Qu, W., Ma, H., Atungulu, G. G., & McHugh, T. H. (2012) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.015 · Cited by 242
Tabaraki, R., Heidarizadi, E., & Benvidi, A. (2012) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2012.06.038 · Cited by 217
Microwave assisted extraction of pectin from waste Citrullus lanatus fruit rinds
Prakash Maran, J., Sivakumar, V., Thirugnanasambandham, K., & Sridhar, R. (2014) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.062 · Cited by 211
Antimicrobial and antioxidant features of ‘Gabsiʼ pomegranate peel extracts
Kharchoufi, S., Licciardello, F., Siracusa, L., Muratore, G., Hamdi, M., & Restuccia, C. (2018) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.10.037 · Cited by 144
Pavlović, M. D., Buntić, A. V., Šiler-Marinković, S. S., & Dimitrijević-Branković, S. I. (2013) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.035 · Cited by 104
Green Extraction from Pomegranate Marcs for the Production of Functional Foods and Cosmetics
Boggia, R., Turrini, F., Villa, C., Lacapra, C., Zunin, P., & Parodi, B. (2016) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph9040063 · Cited by 64
Ventura, J., Alarcón-Aguilar, F., Roman-Ramos, R., Campos-Sepulveda, E., Reyes-Vega, M. L., Daniel Boone-Villa, V., Jasso-Villagómez, E. I., & Aguilar, C. N. (2013) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.07.039 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Osorio-Tobón, J. F. (2020) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-020-04433-2 · Cited by 407
Tangerine, banana and pomegranate peels valorisation for sustainable environment: A review
El Barnossi, A., Moussaid, F., & Iraqi Housseini, A. (2021) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00574 · Cited by 178
Singh, J., Kaur, H. P., Verma, A., Chahal, A. S., Jajoria, K., Rasane, P., Kaur, S., Kaur, J., Gunjal, M., Ercisli, S., et al. (2023) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c02586 · Cited by 152
Martínez-Abad, A., Ramos, M., Hamzaoui, M., Kohnen, S., Jiménez, A., & Garrigós, M. C. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9101493 · Cited by 91
Cano-Lamadrid, M., Martínez-Zamora, L., Castillejo, N., & Artés-Hernández, F. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11172596 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaderides, K., Papaoikonomou, L., Serafim, M., & Goula, A. M.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 137
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0255-2701 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2915013195
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 28.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peels: Optimization, kinetics, and comparison with ultrasounds extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cep.2019.01.006
- The paper
- Kaderides, K., Papaoikonomou, L., Serafim, M., & Goula, A. M. (2019). Microwave-assisted extraction of phenolics from pomegranate peels: Optimization, kinetics, and comparison with ultrasounds extraction. Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
