Cited by 132Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Disease and TransplantationLiver Diseases and Immunity

Accuracy of noninvasive scoring systems in assessing risk of death and liver-related endpoints in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Hagström, Hannes, Nasr, Patrik, Ekstedt, Mattias, Stål, Per, Hultcrantz, Rolf, Kechagias, Stergios·2019·Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract

Background and aims Several non-invasive scoring systems have been developed to determine risk of advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We examined the association between 4 scoring systems and incident severe liver disease and overall mortality in a large cohort of patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD.Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 646 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, recruited from 2 hospitals in Sweden, from 1971 through 2009. The NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), FIB-4, APRI, and BARD scores were calculated at the time of the liver biopsy. Based on each score, patients were assigned to categories of low, intermediate, or high risk for advanced fibrosis. Overall mortality and severe liver disease (cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma) were ascertained through linkage with national registers until the end of 2014. Cox regression, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve, and C-statistic analyses were used to study the predictive capacity of each scoring system.Results During a mean follow-up time of 19.9±8.7 years, there were 214 deaths and 76 cases of severe liver disease. For overall mortality, AUROC curve values were: NFS, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76); FIB-4, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.68-0.76); BARD, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58-0.66); and APRI, 0.52 (95% CI, 0.47-0.57). For severe liver disease, AUROC curve values were: NFS, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78); FIB-4, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.79); BARD, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.55-0.69); APRI, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.63-0.76). C-statistics for all scores were of moderate capacity to predict outcomes.Conclusions In a retrospective analysis of data from 646 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, we found the NFS and the FIB-4 scores to most accurately determine risk of overall death or severe liver disease. However, the AUROC values for these scoring systems are not high enough for use in the clinic; new systems are needed to determine prognoses of patients with NAFLD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.030

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Six retrospective cohort studies on individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD showed that NFS and FIB-4 predict the occurrence of liver-related events (AUROCs from 0.72 to 0.86) and overall mortality (AUROCs from 0.67 to 0.82), with similar or lower accuracy compared to histology.

    “Six retrospective cohort studies on individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD showed that NFS and FIB-4 predict the occurrence of liver-related events (AUROCs from 0.72 to 0.86) and overall mortality (AUROCs from 0.67 to 0.82), 176,177 with a similar or lower accuracy compared to histology.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagström, H., Nasr, P., Ekstedt, M., Stål, P., Hultcrantz, R., & Kechagias, S.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Hagström, Hannes
Venue
Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
1148-1156.e4
ISSN
1542-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901791755
Cited by
132
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stockholm City Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, NAFLD fibrosis score, FIB-4, APRI, BARD score, advanced liver fibrosis, mortality prediction, liver-related mortality, liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensated liver disease, liver failure, prognostic accuracy, liver biopsy, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Adult, Alanine Transaminase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Biopsy, Cause of Death, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Forecasting, Humans, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Severity of Illness Index, Sweden, Biomarkers, Survival Rate, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review