Cited by 33Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationMemory Processes and Influences

Paradoxical effects of information presentation formats and contextual interference on transfer of a complex cognitive skill

de Croock, Marcel B.M., van Merriënboer, Jeroen J.G.·2007·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2005.10.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Croock, M. B. M., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-07
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
1740-1761
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976032660
Cited by
33
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
presentation format, contextual interference, transfer of learning, troubleshooting skills, cognitive schemas, expository teaching, computer simulation, fault diagnosis, cognitive effort, skill acquisition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review