The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
Engineering Psychology and Human Performance
Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G., Banbury, S. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2015) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315665177 · Cited by 5,017
(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203736166 · Cited by 4,103
Agents that reduce work and information overload
Maes, P. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/176789.176792 · Cited by 2,365
Cacioppo, J. T., Tassinary, L. G., Berntson, G. G., Shan, H., Mason, P., Kolb, B., Whishaw, I. Q., Geuter, S., Lindquist, M. A., Wager, T. D., et al. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781107415782 · Cited by 2,032
Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.
Beatty, J. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276 · Cited by 1,959
User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction
Anderson, N. S., Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1988) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422802 · Cited by 1,857
Shifting Intentional Set: Exploring the Dynamic Control of Tasks
(1994) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1478.003.0025 · Cited by 1,328
Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763 · Cited by 1,207
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Association of Interruptions With an Increased Risk and Severity of Medication Administration Errors
Westbrook, J. I. (2010) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.65 · Cited by 772
Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003 · Cited by 707
“…distractions due to movement of images and laptop screen lighting (Melerdiercks, 2005) and multitasking activities (Crook & Barrowcliff, 2001) may cause involuntary shifts of attention among students in close proximity to laptop users (Barak et al., 2006; Chun & Wolfe, 2001; Finn & Inman, 2004).”
BackgroundResultIn-class laptop use and its effects on student learning
Fried, C. B. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006 · Cited by 678
Efficiently Scaling up Crowdsourced Video Annotation
Vondrick, C., Patterson, D. J., & Ramanan, D. (2012) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-012-0564-1 · Cited by 482
“Work in psychology and human-computer interaction reveals that minimizing interruptions and choices can significantly reduce user anxiety and increase efficiency (Schwartz 2005; Bailey and Konstan 2006; Mark et al. 2005).”
Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading
Bowman, L. L., Levine, L. E., Waite, B. M., & Gendron, M. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.024 · Cited by 411
“In the work world, use of IM has been linked to slower time to complete tasks, forgetting of target activities, and more errors in carrying out those activities (Bailey & Konstan, 2006; Cutrell, Czerwinski, & Horvitz, 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bailey, B. P., & Konstan, J. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bailey, Brian P.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 685-708
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063748437
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 32.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- interruptions, task performance, error rate, annoyance, anxiety, affective states, task completion time, primary task, task boundaries, presentation timing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
