The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting adolescents' use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition, research has demonstrated that previous modified versions of TPB that incorporated some of these factors (e.g., personality) have explained a significant amount of variance in excessive SNSs use and addiction -past variants of modified TPB have explained between 45% and 58% of the variance in SNSs use and addiction (Baker & White, 2010;Pelling & White, 2009).”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Baker & White, 2010
In the citing paper
“First, studies have shown that attitude and subjective norms are positively related with individuals' intention to engage in high levels of SNSs use (Baker & White, 2010;Pelling & White, 2009).”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Baker & White, 2010
In the citing paper
“At the same time, some studies did not find association between self-esteem and SNSs use, as well as SNSs addiction (Baker & White, 2010;Skues, Williams, & Wise, 2012;Wilson et al., 2010).”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Baker & White, 2010
In the citing paper
“Past research have shown that while attitude is often a significant antecedent of intention, its relationship with actual behavior is often nonsignificant (Baker & White, 2010;Pelling & White, 2009).”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Baker & White, 2010
In the citing paper
“This suggests that a favorable evaluation of SNSs itself is not a strong motivator to drive individuals into using SNSs excessively.”
From Till logout do us part? Comparison of factors predicting excessive social network sites use and addiction between Singaporean adolescents and adults (2017) · cites this paper as Baker & White, 2010
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Lee, D. J. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300250 · Cited by 22,796
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199269464.003.0005 · Cited by 12,701
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
Willer, D., Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1989) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073157 · Cited by 7,207
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Comscore (2007). Social networking goes global. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1555 (Retrieved January 5, 2009).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.12.009 · Cited by 1,616
“…using, which is a major factor affecting people’s intention to join SNS, as the SNS design is for the purpose of letting the acquainted keep in touch, especially when they are allowed to share with their friends at any time (Baker & White, 2010; Li & Bernoff, 2008; Powell, 2009; Tapscott, 2008).”
BackgroundInfluentialDemographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007 · Cited by 841
“Furthermore, the service includes elements related to social interaction, which are commonly implemented within social network services (Baker & White, 2010; Boyd & Ellison, 2008; Lin & Lu, 2011), such as status updating, ‘‘liking,’’ and commenting.”
Why do people use gamification services?
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006 · Cited by 748
“A strong relationship between attitude and use intentions has been shown in several studies (e.g. Baker & White, 2010; Bock et al., 2005; Lin & Bhattacherjee, 2010; Mäntymäki et al., 2014).”
“Working out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamification
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.018 · Cited by 473
“Furthermore, the number of people using a service has, indeed, been deemed important for services that are centred on social interaction (Baker & White, 2010; Lin & Lu, 2011; Sledgianowski & Kulviwat, 2009).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialTay, B., Jung, Y., & Park, T. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.014 · Cited by 490
“TPB has been successfully applied to individual acceptance of technology products and information systems (Baker & White, 2010; Huang & Chuang, 2007).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, R. K., & White, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Queensland University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- White, Katherine M.
- ORCID
- White, Katherine M.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1591-1597
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979449984
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 44.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- social networking sites, adolescents, extended theory of planned behavior, self-esteem, attitudes, perceived behavioral control, intention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
