Cited by 242Attachment and Relationship DynamicsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook

Park, Namkee, Jin, Borae, Annie Jin, Seung-A·2011·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2011.05.004

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, N., Jin, B., & Annie Jin, S.-A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • Yonsei University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jin, Borae
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1974-1983
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983243750
Cited by
242
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
self-disclosure, relationship intimacy, Facebook, need for affiliation, relationship maintenance, relationship initiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review