The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529310 · Cited by 81,148
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
The qualitative content analysis process
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x · Cited by 22,617
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change
Beck, K. L., & Andres, C. (2000) · Cited by 5,902
Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code
Fowler, M. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45672-4_31 · Cited by 5,591
Manifesto for agile software development
Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., & Thomas, D. A. (2001) · Cited by 4,284
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668 · cited 5×
“As Dybå and Dingsøyr (2008) indicate, search strings in software engineering are language dependent; thus, there is a possibility of missing relevant studies during each search.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAgile Software Development with SCRUM
Schwaber, K., & Beedle, M. (2001) · Cited by 2,656
Refactoring improving the design of existing code
Saca, M. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 37th Central America and Panama Convention (CONCAPAN XXXVII) · doi:10.1109/concapan.2017.8278488 · Cited by 2,054
Cited by
Qazi, A., Hussain, F., Rahim, N. A., Hardaker, G., Alghazzawi, D., Shaban, K., & Haruna, K. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2906402 · Cited by 1,153
Agile Requirements Engineering: A systematic literature review
Schön, E.-M., Thomaschewski, J., & Escalona, M. J. (2017) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.08.011 · Cited by 359
Requirements engineering: A systematic mapping study in agile software development
Curcio, K., Navarro, T., Malucelli, A., & Reinehr, S. (2018) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2018.01.036 · Cited by 169
Requirements engineering for artificial intelligence systems: A systematic mapping study
Ahmad, K., Abdelrazek, M., Arora, C., Bano, M., & Grundy, J. (2023) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107176 · Cited by 132
A Mapping Study on Requirements Engineering in Agile Software Development
Heikkila, V. T., Damian, D., Lassenius, C., & Paasivaara, M. (2015) · 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications · doi:10.1109/seaa.2015.70 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Inayat, I., Salim, S. S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., & Shamshirband, S.
- Venue
- Computers in Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 915-929
- ISSN
- 0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167786744
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046
- The paper
- Inayat, I., Salim, S. S., Marczak, S., Daneva, M., & Shamshirband, S. (2015). A systematic literature review on agile requirements engineering practices and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
