Cited by 45Impact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Technology in LearningCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Examination of the social network sites usage patterns of pre-service teachers

Sendurur, Polat, Sendurur, Emine, Yilmaz, Rezan·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.052

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sendurur, P., Sendurur, E., & Yilmaz, R.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
51
Pages
188-194
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W254097156
Cited by
45
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
social network sites, pre-service teachers, social media use patterns, academic performance, teacher professional development, student-instructor communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review