Cited by 747Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media and Politics

Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active Twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others

Chen, Gina Masullo·2011·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, G. M.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Gina Masullo
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
755-762
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094028256
Cited by
747
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 28
FWCI
40.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
Twitter, uses and gratifications theory, social networking, microblogging, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review