Cited by 33Mobile Learning in EducationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences

Investigating the relationship between thinking style and personal electronic device use and its implications for academic performance

Chen, Ru-Shen, Ji, Chang-Ho·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.042

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students can rapidly share information with other students and teachers, which could lead to more efficient studying and collaboration.

    “Furthermore, students can rapidly share information not only with other students but also with teachers, which could lead to a more ef fi cient studying and collaboration (Chen and Ji, 2015; Lepp et al. , 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, R.-S., & Ji, C.-H.
Affiliations
  • Chihlee Institute of Technology (TW)
  • La Sierra University (US)
Corresponding author
Ji, Chang-Ho
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
52
Pages
177-183
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W597074706
Cited by
32
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Keywords
thinking styles, personal electronic devices, academic performance, abstract thinking, concrete reasoning, educational use of technology, university students, moderating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review