Cited by 77Impact of Technology on AdolescentsEducational Outcomes and InfluencesSchool Choice and Performance

Smartphone use and academic performance: Correlation or causal relationship?

Open access
Baert, Stijn, Vujić, Sunčica, Amez, Simon, Claeskens, Matteo, Daman, Thomas, Maeckelberghe, Arno, Omey, Eddy, De Marez, Lieven·2020·Kyklos

Abstract

SUMMARY: After a decade of correlational research, this study attempts to measure the causal impact of (general) smartphone use on educational performance. To this end, we merge survey data on general smartphone use, exogenous predictors of this use, and other drivers of academic success with the exam scores of first‐year students at two Belgian universities. The resulting data are analysed with instrumental variable estimation techniques. A one‐standard‐deviation increase in daily smartphone use yields a decrease in average exam scores of about one point (out of 20). When relying on ordinary least squares estimations, the magnitude of this effect is substantially underestimated. The negative association between smartphone use and exam results is more outspoken for students (i) with highly educated fathers, (ii) with divorced parents and (iii) who are in good health. Policy‐makers should at least invest in information and awareness campaigns of teachers and parents to highlight this trade‐off between smartphone use and academic performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/kykl.12214

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [6]6. Barkley, Jacob E. and Andrew Lepp (2013). Cellular telephone use is associated with greater sedentary behavior independent of leisure time physical activity. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 38(10): 1023.
  2. [19]19. Hanushek, Eric A. and Dennis D. Kimko (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90(5): 1184-1208
  3. [31]31. Murnane, Richard J., Willett, John B., Duhaldeborde, Yves, and John H. Tyler (2000). How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4): 547-568.
  4. [46]46. Wooldridge, Jeffrey Marc (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baert, S., Vujić, S., Amez, S., Claeskens, M., Daman, T., Maeckelberghe, A., Omey, E., & De Marez, L.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Baert, Stijn
Venue
Kyklos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-11-21
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
22-46
ISSN
  • 0023-5962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6435
OpenAlex
W2802567632
Cited by
77
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
19.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Kyklos (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
smartphone use, academic performance, test scores, university students, causal effects, parental education, parental divorce, student health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review