Cited by 188Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployment and Welfare Studies

Work experiences on MTurk: Job satisfaction, turnover, and information sharing

Brawley, Alice M., Pury, Cynthia L.S.·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.031

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brawley, A. M., & Pury, C. L. S.
Affiliations
Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
Brawley, Alice M.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
54
Pages
531-546
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2285144430
Cited by
188
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1
FWCI
19.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Foshan University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
Amazon Mechanical Turk, crowdsourcing, job satisfaction, turnover, information sharing, contract work, participant recruitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review