Cited by 316Media and Digital CommunicationImpact of Technology on AdolescentsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Need fulfillment and experiences on social media: A case on Facebook and WhatsApp

Karapanos, Evangelos, Teixeira, Pedro, Gouveia, Ruben·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.015

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karapanos, E., Teixeira, P., & Gouveia, R.
Affiliations
Universidade da Madeira (PT)
Corresponding author
Karapanos, Evangelos
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
55
Pages
888-897
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2175943870
Cited by
316
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 4
FWCI
18.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
FCT (PEst-OE/EEI/LA0009/2015)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
social media adoption, need satisfaction, uses and gratifications theory, Facebook, WhatsApp, intimate communication, lifelogging, social media design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review