Cited by 241Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesMedia and Digital Communication

“Looking up and feeling down”. The influence of mobile social networking site use on upward social comparison, self-esteem, and well-being of adult smartphone users

Open access
Schmuck, Desirée, Karsay, Kathrin, Matthes, Jörg, Stevic, Anja·2019·Telematics and Informatics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2019.101240

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frequent use of SNSs is linked to an increase in upward comparisons.

    “Studies have consistently shown that frequent use of SNSs is linked to an increase in these upward comparisons (Gomez et al., 2022; Schmuck et al., 2019; Vogel et al., 2014).”

    From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Schmuck et al., 2019

    Section 5.3 (page unavailable) reports that more frequent mobile Facebook use predicted greater upward social comparison over time. It found no significant longitudinal relationship for Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, or WhatsApp, so this paper does not support the claim as a general finding about frequent SNS use. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the exposure to upward comparisons and their extreme nature are central contributors to the emotional consequences of social media use.

    “Both the exposure to upward comparisons and their extreme nature are central contributors to the emotional consequences of social media use (Gerber et al., 2018; Schmuck et al., 2019; Irmer and Schmiedek, 2023).”

    From The associations between social comparison on social media and young adults’ mental health (2025) · cites this paper as Schmuck et al., 2019

    The Discussion (section 6; page unavailable) reports a direct negative effect of upward social comparison on well-being, supporting the claim about its consequences. Section 2.1 describes comparisons with idealized online portrayals, but the paper does not establish that the *extremity* of a comparison independently contributes to those consequences. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Negative social comparison on social media has been associated with poor mental health such as increased depressive and anxiety symptoms.

    “Similar to PSMU, negative social comparison on social media has been associated with poor mental health such as increased depressive and anxiety symptoms (Appel et al., 2015; Schmuck et al., 2019; Yoon et al., 2019).”

    From Problematic social media use and inhibitory control among post-secondary students (2025) · cites this paper as Schmuck et al., 2019

    The Discussion reports that upward social comparison on social networking sites negatively affects well-being. It mentions an association between Instagram use and depressive symptoms, but does not establish that negative social comparison is associated with depressive symptoms; it does not report anxiety symptoms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous research has often shown that increased SNS use is associated with reduced self-esteem, highlighting risks of upward social comparison.

    “Previous research has often highlighted the risks of upward social comparison on SNSs, showing that increased use is associated with reduced self-esteem”
  • Previous evidence indicates that social comparisons on social networking sites negatively influence self-esteem.

    “This finding is in line with previous evidence that social comparisons on social networking sites negatively influence self-esteem”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 241

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Bayer, J.B., Ellison, N.B., Schoenebeck, S.Y., Falk, E.B., Bayer, J.B., Ellison, N.B., Schoenebeck, S.Y., Falk, E.B., 2016. Sharing the small moments: Ephemeral social interaction on Snapchat. Information, Commun. Soc. 19, 956-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084349 · DOI
  2. Brown, Z., Tiggemann, M. 2016. Attractive celebrity and peer images on Instagram: Effect on women's mood and body image. Body Image, 19, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2016.08.007 · DOI
  3. Buunk, A. P., Gibbons, F.X., 2005. Social comparison orientation: A new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others, in: Guimond, S. (Ed.) Social Comparison and Social Psychology: Understanding Cognition, Intergroup Relations and Culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 15-32.
  4. Frison, E., Eggermont, S., 2016. "Harder, better, faster, stronger": Negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents' life satisfaction are reciprocally related. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 19, 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0296 · DOI
  5. Gonzales, A.L., Hancock, J.T., 2011. Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0411 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Grieve, R., 2017. Unpacking the characteristics of Snapchat users: A preliminary investigation and an agenda for future research. Comput. Human Behav. 74, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.032 · DOI
  7. Haferkamp, N., Krämer, N.C., 2011. Social Comparison 2.0: Examining the effects of online profiles on social-networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 14, 309-314. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2010.0120 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hanna, E., Ward, L.M., Seabrook, R.C., Jerald, M., 2017. Contributions of social comparison and self-objectification in mediating associations between Facebook use and emergent adults' psychological well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 20, 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.0247 · DOI
  9. Huang, H. (2016). Examining the beneficial effects of individuals self-disclosure on the social network site. Comp. Human Behav. 57, 122-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.030 · DOI
  10. Kernis, M.H., 2002. Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self- esteem in psychological functioning. J. Personal. 736, 73, 1569-1606. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Khan, M.L., 2017. Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput. Human Behav. 66, 236-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kornadt, A.E., Rothermund, K., 2012. Internalization of age stereotypes into the self-concept via future self-views: A general model and domain-specific differences. Psychol. Aging 27, 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025110 · DOI
  13. Liu, Q., Zhou, Z., Yang, X., Niu, G., Tian, Y., Fan, C., 2017. Upward social comparison on social network sites and depressive symptoms: A moderated mediation model of self- esteem and optimism. Pers. Individ. Dif. 113, 223-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.03.037 · DOI
  14. Lup, K., Trub, L., Rosenthal, L., 2015. Instagram #Instasad?: Exploring associations among Instagram use, depressive symptoms, negative social comparison, and strangers followed. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 18, 247-252. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0560 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Makki, T.W., Decook, J.R., Kadylak, T., Lee, O.J., 2018. The social value of Snapchat: An exploration of affiliation motivation, the technology acceptance model, and relational maintenance in Snapchat use. Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 34, 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1357903 · DOI
  16. Meier, A., Scha, S., 2018. The positive side of social comparison on social network sites: How envy can drive inspiration on Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 21, 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0708 · DOI
  17. Metzger, M.J., Zhao, B.Y., 2018. Benefits of Browsing? The prevalence, nature, and effects of profile consumption behavior in social network sites. J. Comput. Commun. 23, 72- 89. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx004 · DOI
  18. Morrison, C.M., Gore, H., 2010. The relationship between excessive Internet use and depression: A questionnaire-based study of 1,319 young people and adults. Psychopathology 43, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Neff, K.D., Vonk, R., 2009. Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: Two different ways of relating to oneself. J. Pers. 77, 23-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 6494.2008.00537.x · DOI
  20. Orth, U., Robins, R.W., Widaman, K.F., 2012. Life-span development of self-esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102, 1271-1288. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025558 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Pempek, T.A., Yermolayeva, Y.A., Calvert, S.L., 2009. College students' social networking experiences on Facebook. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 30, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Phua, J., Venus, S., Jay, J., 2017. Uses and gratifications of social networking sites for bridging and bonding social capital: A comparison of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Comput. Human Behav. 72, 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.041 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Reinecke, L., Trepte, S., 2014. Authenticity and well-being on social network sites : A two- wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Comput. Human Behav. 30, 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ridgway, J.L., Clayton, R.B., 2016. Instagram unfiltered: Exploring associations of body image satisfaction, Instagram #Selfie posting, and negative romantic relationship outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behav. Soc. Netw. 19, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0433 · DOI
  25. Rosenberg, M., 1965. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press. Princeton; New Jersey.
  26. Szabo, A., Alpass, F., Allen, J., Stephens, C., 2019. Longitudinal analysis of the relationship between purposes of Internet use and well-being among older adults. 59, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny036 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Stawski, R. S., MacDonald, S. W. S., Sliwinski, M. J., 2015. Measurement burst design. In S. K. Whitbourne (Ed.), The encyclopedia of adulthood and aging (pp. 1-5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/978111 8521373. · DOI
  28. Valkenburg, P.M., Koutamanis, M., Vossen, H.G.M., 2017. The concurrent and longitudinal relationships between adolescents ' use of social network sites and their social self- esteem. Comput. Human Behav. 76, 35-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.008 · DOI
  29. Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J., Schouten, A.P., 2006. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology Behav. 9, 584-590. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Vandenberg, R.J., Lance, C.E., 2000. A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ. Res. Methods 3, 4-70.
  31. Van Zalk, M. H., Branje, S. J., Denissen, J., Van Aken, M. A., Meeus, W. H., 2011. Who benefits from chatting, and why? The roles of extraversion and supportiveness in online chatting and emotional adjustment. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 37(9), 1202-1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211409053 · DOI
  32. Vaterlaus, J.M., Barnett, K., Roche, C., Young, J.A., 2016."Snapchat is more personal": An exploratory study on Snapchat behaviors and young adult interpersonal relationships. Comput. Human Behav. 62, 594-601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.029 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Vries, D.A. De, Möller, A.M., Wieringa, M.S., Anniek, W., Hamelink, K., Vries, D.A. De, Möller, A.M., Wieringa, M.S., Anniek, W., 2018. Social comparison as the thief of joy: Emotional consequences of viewing strangers' Instagram posts. Media Psychol. 21, 222-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1267647 · DOI
  34. Yao, M.Z., Zhong, Z., 2014. Loneliness, social contacts and Internet addiction: A cross- lagged panel study. Comput. Human Behav. 30, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.08.007 · DOI
  35. Yoo, J. H., Jeong, E. J., 2017. Psychosocial effects of SNS use: A longitudinal study focused on the moderation effect of social capital. Comput. Human Behav. 69, 108-119. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.011 · DOI

Authors
Schmuck, D., Karsay, K., Matthes, J., & Stevic, A.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Schmuck, Desirée
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
42
Pages
101240
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955397421
Cited by
241
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2
FWCI
36.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
upward social comparison, self-esteem, well-being, Facebook use, Instagram use, smartphone users, adults, social media influence, bidirectional relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review