Cited by 422Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Growing Up Wired: Social Networking Sites and Adolescent Psychosocial Development

Open access
Spies Shapiro, Lauren A., Margolin, Gayla·2014·Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Abstract

Since the advent of social networking site (SNS) technologies, adolescents' use of these technologies has expanded and is now a primary way of communicating with and acquiring information about others in their social network. Overall, adolescents and young adults' stated motivations for using SNSs are quite similar to more traditional forms of communication-to stay in touch with friends, make plans, get to know people better, and present oneself to others. We begin with a summary of theories that describe the role of SNSs in adolescents' interpersonal relationships, as well as common methodologies used in this field of research thus far. Then, with the social changes that occur throughout adolescence as a backdrop, we address the ways in which SNSs intersect with key tasks of adolescent psychosocial development, specifically peer affiliation and friendship quality, as well as identity development. Evidence suggests that SNSs differentially relate to adolescents' social connectivity and identity development, with sociability, self-esteem, and nature of SNS feedback as important potential moderators. We synthesize current findings, highlight unanswered questions, and recommend both methodological and theoretical directions for future research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10567-013-0135-1

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher social media usage, along with developmental vulnerabilities, in adolescents and young adults has been proposed to explain the higher association with worse mental health outcomes compared to adults.

    “Higher social media usage, along with developmental vulnerabilities, in adolescents and young adults has been proposed to explain the higher association with worse mental health outcomes compared to adults [57,58].”

    From Problematic Social Media Use in Adolescents and Young Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. (2022) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Introduction describes extensive SNS use among adolescents and young adults, and its theories section discusses how excessive use may contribute to depressive symptoms, particularly alongside limited offline social connections or poor social skills. The paper does not establish that their association with worse mental health outcomes is stronger than adults’, or propose those factors as an explanation for that age-group difference. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media provides near constant opportunities for interaction, particularly through mobile technologies.

    “As adolescents are striving for more frequent connections with peers, social media provides near constant opportunities for interaction, particularly via mobile technologies (Spies Shapiro and Margolin 2013).”
  • Only very recently, the focus has shifted toward younger population groups.

    “Only very recently, the focus has shifted toward younger population groups [22-26].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Institute of Medicine The science of adolescent risk-taking Summary of a workshop Workshop Highlights 2010 Retrieved from: http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/2010/The-Science-of-Adolescent-Risk-Taking/Adolescent%20Risk%202010%20Highlights.pdf
  2. Steinfield C Ellison NB Lampe C Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 2008 29 434 445

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spies Shapiro, L. A., & Margolin, G.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Published
2013-05-04
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 1096-4037 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2827
OpenAlex
W2051770943
Cited by
422
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH087029)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD046807)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social networking sites, adolescents, psychosocial development, peer affiliation, friendship quality, identity construction, self-esteem, sociability, social connectedness, interpersonal relationships, online communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Self Concept, Internet, Friends, Adolescent Development, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review