Cited by 192Impact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Excessive use of mobile social networking sites: Negative consequences on individuals

Zheng, Xiabing, Lee, Matthew K.O.·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.011

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, X., & Lee, M. K. O.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Xiabing
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
65
Pages
65-76
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2515414420
Cited by
192
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5
FWCI
31.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (CityU 192513)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571948)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
excessive use, negative consequences, cognitive-behavioral model, social cognitive theory, family life, personal life, professional life, pervasive technologies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review