Cited by 63Cyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorImpact of Technology on AdolescentsTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

Excessive SNS use at work, technological conflicts and employee performance: A social-cognitive-behavioral perspective

Saleem, Sumera, Feng, Yang, Luqman, Adeel·2021·Technology in Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101584

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saleem, S., Feng, Y., & Luqman, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Fatima Jinnah Women University (PK)
Venue
Technology in Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
65
Pages
101584
ISSN
0160-791X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3153837843
Cited by
63
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
FWCI
19.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Technology in Society (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71631006)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
employee performance, task conflict, process conflict, relationship conflict, social cognitive theory, cognitive-behavioral model, social media in the workplace, Chinese employees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review