Cited by 126Impact of Technology on AdolescentsCyberloafing and Workplace BehaviorEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Adolescents' academic engagement mediates the association between Internet addiction and academic achievement: The moderating effect of classroom achievement norm

Zhang, Yunyun, Qin, Xingna, Ren, Ping·2018·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.018

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Qin, X., & Ren, P.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ren, Ping
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
89
Pages
299-307
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887305021
Cited by
126
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
Young Scholar Project of Beijing Education Sciences Planning Program (BCEA16022)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
internet addiction, academic performance, academic engagement, adolescents, mediation, moderation, classroom climate, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review